Wednesday, October 3, 2012

[PANAS] Najib Malu, Video Hangout Terpaksa Di"private"kan

[PANAS] Najib Malu, Video Hangout Terpaksa Di"private"kan


[PANAS] Najib Malu, Video Hangout Terpaksa Di"private"kan

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 10:31 AM PDT



Tak sampai sejam sesi hangout Najib Razak tamat, video tersebut yang sepatutnya masih boleh ditonton telah diprivatekan.

Video sesi hangout Anwar Ibrahim yang dirakamkan pada 17 ogos lepas peliknya masih boleh ditonton hingga tengah malam tadi.

Mungkinkah faktor terlalu banyak yang dislike dan komen-komen yang agak pedas telah membuatkan najib razak bersetuju untuk memprivatekan video tersebut?.

Baiklah, kita bezakan siapa lebih telus?, besar kemungkinan video najib akan diedit (dipotong-potong) dan dimuat semula bagi menutup peristiwa memalukan yang telah "tukanglawan" siarkan sebelum ini.

Ini bermakna, najib tidak dapat terima riaksi ramai yang jelas tidak memihak pada najib pada sesi selama 1 jam itu.

Untuk mengatakan memang siaran itu tidak dapat ditonton selepas sesi tamat itu mustahil kerana video Google hangout Anwar Ibrahim terus boleh ditonton sehingga kini tanpa perlu ada suntingan atau pengubahsuaian sebelum dinaik semula.

, semua yang disiarkan adalah rakaman semasa sesi itu berlangsung seharusnya boleh terus ditonton tanpa masalah..

Disini ketelusan 2 orang pemimpin dapat kita bezakan... najib cepatx2 padam video kerana terlalu ramai yang dislike, manakala Anwar tiada apa mahu disembunyikan kerana itu hangout Anwar masih boleh ditonton hingga sekarang. -tukanglawan



Link untuk video tersebut : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5VGha5iuzo


World Animal Day Check Up For Petpositive Dogs

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 09:00 AM PDT

Dr Prem checking Reba

PETPOSITIVE NEWS

DATELINE PETALING JAYA:

IT'S WORLD ANIMAL DAY today folks - and two of my dogs were due for their annual boosters yesterday. 

And what an adventure it turned out to be to cart the suspicious canines to the local vet. 



"Strong and healthy," he pronounces

It had to take two cars - mine and Andrew Martin's as we headed out in the afternoon


Tiada Pilihan: Perhimpunan Rasaksa Pakatan Rakyat 3 Nov Stadium Bukit Jalil

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 09:36 AM PDT

Tidak tunai tuntutan Bersih, lagi himpunan 3 Nov

KUALA LUMPUR: Pakatan Rakyat julung kalinya akan menganjurkan himpunan besar-besaran yang akan diadakan di Stadium Nasional Bukit Jalil pada 3 November nanti.

Dengan tema 'Himpunan Kebangkitan Rakyat', Pakatan Rakyat mensasarkan kehadiran sejuta rakyat negara ini.

Timbalan Presiden PAS, Mohammad Sabu berkata, himpunan itu bertujuan untuk menggesa lapan tuntutan Gabungan Menuntut Pilihan Raya Bersih dan Adil (Bersih) yang hampir tidak dihiraukan langsung oleh pemerintah.

Katanya, dua perkara pokok harus diberi penekanan oleh pemerintah terutama daftar pemilih yang bersih dan media yang langsung tidak berubah.

Jelasnya, kempen mengutuk himpunan Bersih 3.0 berterusan di media perdana sedangkan pendengaran awam di Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia (Suhakam) telah menunjukkan bagaimana pihak keselamatan langsung tidak mengikuti prosedur operasi standad (SOP) ketika mengendalikan himpunan pada 24 April lalu.

"Oleh kerana keadaan berterusan dan lapan tuntutan oleh rakyat tidak dihiraukan maka kami perlu lagi satu himpunan pada 3 Nov nanti iaitu Himpunan Kebangkitan Rakyat," katanya dalam sidang media di lobi Parlimen hari ini.

Beliau berkata, himpunan itu akan melibatkan Pakatan Rakyat, badan bukan kerajaan dan rakyat di luar sana untuk menuntut seterusnya menyambung tuntutan Bersih yang mahukan pilihan raya yang bebas dan telus.

"Apa terus meragukan misalnya ditemui 60 000 daftar pemilih pos yang tanpa proses semakan, yang perlu dijelaskan oleh SPR.

"Bagaimana hendak adakan pilihan raya sedangkan daftar pemilih dan juga penglibatan pengeluaran mykad palsu yang ditemui begitu ketara sekali," katanya.

Justeru, Pakatan khuatir bahawa Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) boleh mengendalikan pilihan raya yang bersih untuk PRU-13 ini.

Turut bersama dalam sidang media Pakatan Rakyat, Ahli Parlimen Rantau Panjang Siti Zailah Mohd Yusof, Ahli Parlimen Kota Raja Siti Mariah Mahmud, Ahli Parlimen Kuantan Fuziah Salleh, Ahli Parlimen Rasah Anthony Loke, dan Ahli Parlimen Batu Tian Chua. -HD




Doha to host second meeting on Muslims in Myanmar on Thursday

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 06:38 AM PDT

Source: Doha to host second meeting on Muslims in Myanmar on Thursday

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and Non -Governmental Organizations (NGOs) provide recommendations related to the situation in Myanmar after they held a meeting on Friday (3/8) and in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Recommendations of the meeting consisted of nine points. The first inter-communal violence that is condemned indiscriminately that has erupted in Myanmar and cause the loss of most of their lives and livelihoods, and asked the international community to support and mobilize efforts in Myanmar in accordance with humanitarian principles like impartiality, neutrality, and independence.

The Committee shall perform the following responsibilities, among others, create a special fund for reconstruction and rehabilitation in the region of Arakan under the auspices of the OIC, and create an international media campaign, including social media, to share information about the protracted violence in Myanmar and humanitarian consequences for the minority groups in the country. The Committee was also in charge of organizing an international conference about the unrest in Myanmar and humanitarian consequences for minorities in the country, in cooperation with other international bodies, and set up a private group of leading international advocate for peace, sustainable solutions to the unrest in Myanmar and humanitarian consequences for minorities in the country. It is noted that some 69,000 people in Myanmar (also known as Burma) have been displaced by recent clashes in Rakhine State in Western Burma, according to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR). About 46% of the displaced people are children. More than 5,000 buildings were destroyed. The conditions are dire: Fires have been burning for weeks and a state of emergency has been declared. According to government reports, the majority of those fleeing are Muslims. The UN reports that some 800,000 Muslims of Rohingya ethnicity live in Myanmar in the northern Rakhine State. They are regarded as some of the most persecuted people in the world, and face regular food shortages. As clashes continue in their home area, their desperate situation has turned even more horrid. Some who have fled the recent violence have crossed over into neighboring Bangladesh. But as the violence continues and more refugees attempt to escape, many are being turned away and any existing refugee camps are being capped.


Burma Ethnic Cleansing

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 06:22 AM PDT


Obama Lied After People Died Center for Security Policy | Oct 01, 2012 By Frank Gaffney, Jr. Suddenly, the President's new clothes seem embarrassingly transparent. The contention relentlessly promoted by Team Obama, to the effect that the Commander-in-Chief's performance with respect to foreign policy and national security was simply unassailable, is being seen for what it is: an utter fraud. The deal-breaker has been the accumulating evidence that President Obama and his subordinates disinformed the American people - to put it charitably - about a present danger: the outbreak of violence against our diplomatic personnel and facilities and other interests in more than 30 countries around the world. Specifically, they denied that a carefully planned and executed jihadist attack against our consulate in Benghazi was responsible for the murder of the Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues on September 11, 2012. The party line assiduously pushed for days thereafter by administration spokesmen including, most risibly UN Ambassador Susan Rice, was that the attack spontaneously ensued from a demonstration outside the U.S. compound prompted by an American video, "Innocence of Muslims," which reviles the founder of Islam. And, so the story went, the demonstrators got carried away and wound up sacking the consulate and a nearby safe house, in the course of which the four victims were killed. It turns out that Team Obama knew early on that such representations were untrue. In a blog post headlined "Some administration officials were concerned about initial White House push blaming Benghazi attack on mob, video," ABC News' Jake Tapper recounted on September 27th that, "The Daily Beast's Eli Lake on Wednesday reported that intelligence officials said ‘the early information was enough to show that the attack was planned and the work of al Qaeda affiliates operating in Eastern Libya.' ‘There was very good information on this in the first 24 hours,' one of the officials told Lake. For one thing, on September 10th, al Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahiri, had issued a public call for retribution against the United States for a recent assassination by drone strike of one of his senior commanders. The consulate in Benghazi was low-hanging fruit - a vulnerable facility in a jihadist-infested city with a high-value target, a U.S. ambassador, who had no security. Insult was added to injury as our Commander-in-Chief - he who has not been able to find time for most of his daily intelligence briefings - reportedly went to bed after being advised that the consulate was under attack. When he awoke, Mr. Obama made a Rose Garden statement expressing regret at the loss of the four Americans' lives and rejecting "all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Astonishingly, he neglected to mention anything about the roughly concurrent attack on the U.S. embassy in Cairo.) Then, on September 18th, President Obama insisted during an appearance on David Letterman's show that the attacks on a number of diplomatic missions "including the one in Libya" were conducted by "extremists and terrorists" who "used...as an excuse" popular anger at the release of the video by a "shadowy character who lives here." The President could not at that point have been under any illusion about the veracity of that statement concerning the Benghazi bloodletting. It was, in short, a lie. Worse yet, it was, as we shall see, a lie that served the interests of America's enemies. Incredibly, even after his own press spokesman acknowledged on September 20th that the murderous assault in Libya was not the spontaneous work of a mob, Mr. Obama used his speech before the UN General Assembly on September 25th to perpetuate the meme that those offended by our freedom of expression are responsible for such attacks - not jihadists doctrinally obliged to seek our destruction. While the President used much of the speech to profess his opposition to such behavior, he declared that, "The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam." That is a call for non-Muslims to abide by shariah blasphemy laws that could have been uttered by any Islamic supremacist, including al Qaeda's Osama bin Laden, the Muslim Brotherhood's chief jurist Yusef al-Qaradawi or Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini. After all, it has been a top priority of these and our other Islamist foes - notably, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) - to begin establishing their dominion over the rest of us by restricting what we can say, and therefore know and do, about Islam and its totalitarian doctrine known as shariah. President Obama and his subordinates (notably, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "Istanbul Process") have been playing directly into such adversaries' efforts to prohibit and criminalize shariah blasphemy with their serial complaints and apologies about the video. By so doing, the Obama administration is effectively inviting more violence against Americans deemed "offensive" to the Islamists, making the world a more dangerous place for all of us. Critics of George W. Bush harshly chastised him for allegedly misleading the American people about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction in order to get us into a needless and unjustified war. They insisted that "Bush lied, people died." Never mind that it wasn't true. Mr. Bush acted on the basis of what was known at the time: Saddam had used such weapons previously and had not verifiably eliminated either his remaining stocks or the capacity to make more. Will those once so vociferous about presidential truth-telling be equally seized with the fact that "Obama lied after people died"?

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 05:46 AM PDT

Center for Security Policy | Oct 01, 2012
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.

Suddenly, the President's new clothes seem embarrassingly transparent.  The contention relentlessly promoted by Team Obama, to the effect that the Commander-in-Chief's performance with respect to foreign policy and national security was simply unassailable, is being seen for what it is: an utter fraud. The deal-breaker has been the accumulating evidence that President Obama and his subordinates disinformed the American people - to put it charitably - about a present danger: the outbreak of violence against our diplomatic personnel and facilities and other interests in more than 30 countries around the world.  Specifically, they denied that a carefully planned and executed jihadist attack against our consulate in Benghazi was responsible for the murder of the Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues on September 11, 2012.

The party line assiduously pushed for days thereafter by administration spokesmen including, most risibly UN Ambassador Susan Rice, was that the attack spontaneously ensued from a demonstration outside the U.S. compound prompted by an American video, "Innocence of Muslims," which reviles the founder of Islam. And, so the story went, the demonstrators got carried away and wound up sacking the consulate and a nearby safe house, in the course of which the four victims were killed. It turns out that Team Obama knew early on that such representations were untrue.  In a blog post headlined "Some administration officials were concerned about initial White House push blaming Benghazi attack on mob, video," ABC News' Jake Tapper recounted on September 27th that, "The Daily Beast's Eli Lake on Wednesday reported that intelligence officials said 'the early information was enough to show that the attack was planned and the work of al Qaeda affiliates operating in Eastern Libya.' 'There was very good information on this in the first 24 hours,' one of the officials told Lake.

For one thing, on September 10th, al Qaeda's Ayman al-Zawahiri, had issued a public call for retribution against the United States for a recent assassination by drone strike of one of his senior commanders.  The consulate in Benghazi was low-hanging fruit - a vulnerable facility in a jihadist-infested city with a high-value target, a U.S. ambassador, who had no security. 

Insult was added to injury as our Commander-in-Chief - he who has not been able to find time for most of his daily intelligence briefings - reportedly went to bed after being advised that the consulate was under attack.  When he awoke, Mr. Obama made a Rose Garden statement expressing regret at the loss of the four Americans' lives and rejecting "all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Astonishingly, he neglected to mention anything about the roughly concurrent attack on the U.S. embassy in Cairo.)

Then, on September 18th, President Obama insisted during an appearance on David Letterman's show that the attacks on a number of diplomatic missions "including the one in Libya" were conducted by "extremists and terrorists" who "used...as an excuse" popular anger at the release of the video by a "shadowy character who lives here."  The President could not at that point have been under any illusion about the veracity of that statement concerning the Benghazi bloodletting.  It was, in short, a lie.  Worse yet, it was, as we shall see, a lie that served the interests of America's enemies. 

Incredibly, even after his own press spokesman acknowledged on September 20th that the murderous assault in Libya was not the spontaneous work of a mob, Mr. Obama used his speech before the UN General Assembly on September 25th to perpetuate the meme that those offended by our freedom of expression are responsible for such attacks - not jihadists doctrinally obliged to seek our destruction.  While the President used much of the speech to profess his opposition to such behavior, he declared that, "The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam." That is a call for non-Muslims to abide by shariah blasphemy laws that could have been uttered by any Islamic supremacist, including al Qaeda's Osama bin Laden, the Muslim Brotherhood's chief jurist Yusef al-Qaradawi or Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini. 

After all, it has been a top priority of these and our other Islamist foes - notably, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) - to begin establishing their dominion over the rest of us by restricting what we can say, and therefore know and do, about Islam and its totalitarian doctrine known as shariah.  President Obama and his subordinates (notably, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "Istanbul Process") have been playing directly into such adversaries' efforts to prohibit and criminalize shariah blasphemy with their serial complaints and apologies about the video.  By so doing, the Obama administration is effectively inviting more violence against Americans deemed "offensive" to the Islamists, making the world a more dangerous place for all of us.

Critics of George W. Bush harshly chastised him for allegedly misleading the American people about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction in order to get us into a needless and unjustified war.  They insisted that "Bush lied, people died."  Never mind that it wasn't true.  Mr. Bush acted on the basis of what was known at the time: Saddam had used such weapons previously and had not verifiably eliminated either his remaining stocks or the capacity to make more. Will those once so vociferous about presidential truth-telling be equally seized with the fact that "Obama lied after people died"? Centre For Security Policy


In Search for the Right To Vote

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 05:45 AM PDT

Harpers Magazine featured a very thought-provoking article written by Victoria Bassetti on In Search of the Right To Vote.

From Electoral Dysfunction, released in September by the New Press, in conjunction with a PBS documentary of the same name.

The right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which other rights are protected. To take away this right is to reduce a man to slavery, for slavery consists in being subject to the will of another, and he that has not a vote in the election of representatives is in this case.
—Thomas Paine, Dissertation on First Principles of Government (1795)

In 1806, when Thomas Paine walked into his New Rochelle polling station to cast his vote for the congressional election, he was turned away, denied the ballot. The Tory election inspectors asserted that he was not an American and that he had been renounced by George Washington. He told them they were wrong on both counts, but one of the inspectors threatened to have him arrested, and Paine left without voting. He pursued the matter in court and lost. He had no right to vote in the nation that now counts him one of its Founders.

In the two centuries since Paine's disenfranchisement, the Constitution has been amended numerous times to address voting issues. In the twelve years since the 2000 presidential election, billions of dollars have been thrown at the mechanics of voting—the machines we use, the way we register—and there have been legislative initiatives in almost every state targeting voter-identification requirements as well as early- and absentee-voting rules. But one thing has not changed since the day Paine walked into his New York polling station. The Constitution still does not guarantee the right to vote.

The word "vote" appears in the Constitution as originally drafted only in relation to how representatives, senators, and presidential electors perform their duties. Representatives vote. But the people's vote is not mentioned. The Constitution gives Congress the right to pass copyright and bankruptcy laws, the right to borrow money, the right to establish post offices, the right to "fix the Standard of Weights and Measures." Congress was required to keep a journal of its proceedings. Members of Congress were guaranteed a salary. Amid this wealth of detail, scarcely a word is spent on how the people are to vote.

Even in the Bill of Rights, which made a slew of individual rights explicit, the Constitution did not mention a right to vote. The right to assemble and to petition government was established. The right to trial by jury (in civil disputes where the value exceeds $20), to due process of law, to confront witnesses in criminal cases, to keep and bear arms? Yes. Voting rights? No. It's almost as if in the course of constructing a house, the contractor ordered the windows, curtains, and shingles, but completely forgot about the foundation.

Contrary to many common accounts, the Founders were not stiff-necked, antidemocratic elitists hostile to the swarm of unwashed voters. But during that hot summer in Philadelphia in 1787, the adage that politics is the art of the possible held sway. It was not politically practicable to impose uniform suffrage laws across the former colonies. Was the fragile new federal government really going to tell South Carolina that free blacks could vote? Or was it going to have to do the opposite and tell Massachusetts, which did allow blacks to vote, that it would have to stop? Easier to let state laws and provisions dealing with the vote stand.

CLICK HERE for the rest of the entry.


Obama Out to Lunch at the U.N. By Claudia Rosett

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 05:40 AM PDT

At last week's grand gathering of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, one of the Obama administration's worst fumbles was largely unreported by the U.S. media. It came during Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Thursday speech to the assembly. In the face of Iran's advancing nuclear program and repeated threats to annihilate Israel, Netanyahu was presenting an urgent case for drawing a red line against Iran's ability to make nuclear weapons. "The relevant question," he said, "is not when Iran will get the bomb. The relevant question is at what stage can we no longer stop Iran from getting the bomb."

The prime minister presented this essential declaration to a U.N. chamber dominated by member states whose governments are for the most part hostile to Israel. More than half of them belong to the Non-Aligned Movement, now chaired by Iran. Meanwhile, the most important diplomat to whom Netanyahu should be able to look for support the U.S.'s ambassador to the U.N., was not there.. Amid the theater of U.N. summit speeches, where symbolism matters, Ambassador Susan Rice should have been right there in the chamber — not only to listen to America's embattled ally, but to be witnessed by the world, and especially by other delegations to the U.N., heeding every word and applauding at the end. If Rice absolutely could not be present, Secretary of State Clinton, also in New York for meetings, should have been there.

Instead, seated in Rice's place at the head of the U.S. delegation was an under-secretary of state, Wendy Sherman. Sherman is a veteran of the Clinton administration's unsuccessful nonproliferation dalliance with North Korea, and more recently took part in the Obama administration's failed talks with Iran.    Where was Rice? There's been astoundingly little coverage of her ill-timed vanishing act, apart from the Israeli press and Fox News, on which U.N. commentator Anne Bayefsky raised the question and talk-show anchor Greta Van Susteren gave it brief mention.

In response to my own queries about Rice's absence, a spokesperson for the U.S. Mission to the U.N. said that Rice had been at the General Assembly earlier in the day, but left before Netanyahu spoke. This was due to a cascading set of scheduling conflicts in which the top priority was apparently Clinton's commitment to speak elsewhere at an event for an initiative called "Connecting the Americas 2022." That meant Clinton could not attend a ministerial-level lunch meeting of the five permanent members (P5) of the Security Council, so Rice had to fill in at the P5 lunch. According to the U.S. mission, Rice might have been able to cram in Netanyahu's speech before the P5 lunch, had the GA speakers stuck to their allotted time slots. But as the speeches preceding Netanyahu's ran late, Rice "notified" the Israelis that she had to leave, and they apparently "understood."

But this explanation just doesn't wash. Whether the Israelis "understood" or not, Rice should done whatever it took to be there for Netanyahu's speech, even if that meant a late solo lunch at a hot-dog stand. Even if either Clinton or Rice had to attend the P5 lunch, surely State could have convinced the Connecting Americas audience to "understand" that however important it is to connect the Americas by 2022, there's a life-and-death nuclear crisis looming in the Middle East on a much more urgent schedule.

Further, anyone familiar with the U.N. surely knows that General Assembly speeches almost always run long, and thus it's simply not believable that Rice planned to be there for Netanyahu's speech and to attend the P5 lunch. When Rice was scheduled to take Clinton's place at the luncheon, it was pretty much a done deal that they were placing a higher priority on her lunch appetizer than on Netanyahu's speech. (To infer anything else would be to vastly underrate the scheduling talents of Susan Rice. Just a fortnight earlier, she had managed to appear on no fewer than five separate Sunday shows, spreading the absurd and now discredited message that the Benghazi attack was "spontaneous.") Worse, in trying to defend Rice's absence, the U.S. mission stressed that in leaving, she also missed the Palestinian president's speech, as if the discourtesies were somehow equivalent. Israel is a close U.S. ally under direct, explicit, and increasingly urgent threat of annihilation by a terror-based Iranian regime seeking nuclear weapons. The Palestinian Authority is none of these.

Nor is it easy to discern why, at a time of worsening crisis over the Iranian nuclear program, it was urgent for Rice to abandon the Israeli prime minister in order to attend a lunch where two of the attendees, Russia and China, have been running interference for Iran for years. If, during last Thursday's lunch, unusual progress was achieved on this front, or indeed on any front, there's been no visible sign of it.

Moreover, the absence of Clinton and Rice was not the worst part of America's appalling diplomatic dereliction during last week's U.N. meetings. Their priorities were of a piece with administration practice. President Obama himself, who has placed the U.N. at the center of his foreign policy, spent less than 24 hours in New York for this year's conclave, with part of that time devoted to appearing as, in his own words, "eye candy" on The View.

Apart from hosting a reception for visiting heads of state, Obama found time for only one official U.N. event, his own speech. When he worked his way around to Iran, he did promise that the U.S. "will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon." But then he proclaimed his preference for yet more "time and space" for diplomacy, with only the vague reminder — unlikely to wow the ayatollahs or anyone else — that "time is not unlimited." In a departure from custom, including his own, Obama not only skipped the U.N. secretary general's annual summit lunch, but made no time for bilateral meetings with any foreign leaders, including Netanyahu. When Obama himself finally connected with Netanyahu, on Friday, it was for a 20-minute phone call.

One might ask why the U.S. bothers with hosting the General Assembly, an annual festival of tyrants and traffic gridlock, in the first place. But if U.S. support for Israel at this shindig consists of being out to lunch at crucial moments and phoning in a day later, it's time to cut the losses. Do it all over video conference.

— Claudia Rosett is a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and heads its Investigative Reporting Project. The National Review


Malacca state agencies 'sponsored' mega kenduri by Aidila Razak 5:56PM Oct 3, 2012

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 05:47 AM PDT

The Army should have done a "butt" dance during the wedding, instead of clearing up the shit - edit. A leaked document from the Malacca State Development Corporation (PKNM) allegedly shows that state agencies had sponsored the wedding ceremony of Malacca chief minister Mohd Ali Rustam's eldest son last Sunday. Debating the budget in Parliament today, Mahfuz Omar (PAS-Pokok Sena) (right) said the document showed that a meeting hosted by PKNM was especially called to discuss the "logistics of the ceremony" on Sept 30.

"The CM's special officer today admitted that the event was sponsored to the tune of RM10 per guest and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) must look into this (as) this is a personal event. "The meeting minutes mention the government departments involved and state that no bills should be claimed from the chief minister, everything is free.

NONEAccording to the copy of the minutes made available to the media later, PKNM chief executive officer Yusof Jantan had instructed that the meeting was to "discuss the preparations in terms of outdoor decoration, cleanliness and logistics of the CM's son's wedding on Sept 30".

"(Yusof) later stressed that all preparation should be conducted at the discretion of the departments, and nothing should be billed to the chief minister or the state government," the minutes read. Armed forces to clean up The minutes, dated Aug 23, 2012 also states that 100 tents were sponsored by four local councils (Hang Tuah Jaya, Melaka Bersejarah, Alor Gajah and Jasin).

"(Yusof) will refer to the armed forces to get more tents and the final amount will be confirmed in the next meeting," it reads.

NONE"All tents must include chairs, tables, fans, lights, scallops and table cloths. The colour of the table cloths and scallops will be determined later."

Other sponsored items include:


  • A generator set by the Works Department, along with an officer to do wiring works.
  • Water taps by Syarikat Air Melaka Bhd for guests to wash their hands.
  • Cleaning staff by local councils, with duties to be determined by the Development and Coordination Committee of the State Legislative Assembly. (Yusof is said to be confirming cooperation from the armed forces in this matter.)
  • Performances by the state National Cultural and Department (this was to be confirmed by Yusof).
The minutes also mention a "site visit" to the Tun Ali Hall by the "secretariat".

NONEThe meeting was attended by the CM's private secretary Ali Mohamed, representatives of local councils, the Works Department and the National Cultural and Arts Department.

The CM was today reported as saying that the event, which attracted 130,000 people and was recorded in the Malaysia World Book of Records, cost RM600,000.

Related stories

My son's wedding wasn't extravagant, says CM

Some Malaccans defend Ali Rustam's 'mega kenduri'

View comments (52) Malaysiakini


[BERGAMBAR & VIDEO] Royalti: Mahkamah Persekutuan Benar Dua Permohonan Kelantan

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 07:04 AM PDT



Putrajaya - Mahkamah Persekutuan hari ini membenarkan dua permohonan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan berhubung isu menangguhkan prosiding yang sedang berlangsung di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpurdan permohonan merayu terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan berhubung perbicaraan isu royalti minyak.

Panel Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan, diketuai Tan Sri Mohd Raus Sharif membuat keputusan itu setelah dipersetujui sebulat suaraoleh hakim-hakim lain, selepas mendengar permohonan dibawa peguam bagi pihak Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan, Tommy Thomas.

Panel hakim yang lain ialah Datuk Ahmad Maarop, Datuk Zainun Ali, Datuk Seri SulongMatjeraie dan Datuk Jefferey Tan.

Semasa prosiding berlangsung, Thomas berkata, pihaknya memohon agar kes yang sedang berlangsung di Mahkamah Tinggiditangguhkan sehingga Mahkamah Persekutuan membuat keputusan terhadap permohonan yang difailkan di mahkamah tersebut.

Mahkamah Persekutuan turut membenarkan permohonan rayuan yang difailkan oleh Kerajaan Kelantan terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan,yang sebelum ini telah memutuskan kes saman pelanggaran kontrak terhadap Petronas dijalankan mengikut isu perundangan.

Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur sebelum ini memutuskan isu dalam kes saman pelanggaran kontrak terhadap Petronas, yang difailkan kerajaan Kelantan, dijalankan melalui isu perundangan.

Kerajaan Kelantan seterusnya membuat rayuan di Mahkamah Rayuan kerana mahu kes tersebut dijalankan menerusi perbicaraan penuh untuk memanggil saksi-saksi dan barangan-barangan kes yang terlibat.

Bagaimanapun pada 26 April lalu, Mahkamah Rayuan menolak permohonan Kerajaan Kelantan bagi mengetepikan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi dan memutuskan kes saman tersebut perlu didengar dan diselesaikan mengikut isu perundangan.

Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan berhasrat untuk menjalankan perbicaraan secara penuh kerana tanpa perbicaraan penuh, ia sangat prejudis terhadap Kerajaan Kelantan.

Peguam Tan Sri Cecil Abraham mewakili Petronas.

Dalam pernyataan tuntutannya, Kerajaan Kelantan menuntut Petronas supaya membuat pembayaran tunggakan dan bayaran tunai seterusnya bagi petroleum dihasilkan di luar pantai Kelantan seperti ditetapkan dalam perjanjian petroleum; serta menuntut ganti rugi dan kos.

Dalam tuntutan, kerajaan negeri menyatakan bahawa Perjanjian Petroleum Kelantan dimeterai pada 9 Mei 1975, jelas menyebut bahawa Petronas perlu membayar tunai lima peratus daripada hasil minyak sama ada daripada usaha carigali di kawasan pantai atau luar pantai.

Ia menyatakan satu perenggan daripada perjanjian itu menyebut bahawa pembayaran hendaklah dibuat secara tunai dua kali setahun pada atau sebelum 1 Mac atau pada atau sebelum 1 September.

Kronologi kes saman Kelantan terhadap Petronas.

Berikut adalah kronologi kes saman kerajaan negeri Kelantan terhadap Petronas ekoran isu pembayaran royalti minyak.

2010

i Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan telah menfaikan writ saman terhadap Petronas di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur pada 30 Ogos 2009.

ii Kerajaan Persekutuan kemudiannya menfailkan permohonan untuk dijadikan defenden kedua. Pada masa yang sama Mahkamah Tinggi telah menukarkan kes daripada Mahkamah Bahagian Dagangan ke Mahkamah Sivil. Pertukaran dilakukan secara dalaman tanpa perbincangan dengan kedua-dua belah pihak (Kerajaan negeri dan Petronas). Hanya notis dikeluarkan.

iii Kelantan kemudiannya telah menfailkan permohonan untuk memindahkan kes di Mahkamah Sivil ke Mahkmah Bahagian Dagangan. Permohonan ini tidak dibantah Petronas.

iv Dua permohonan iaitu permohonan Kerajaan Persekutuan untuk dijadikan defenden kedua dan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan mohon pindahkan kes ke Mahkamah Bahagian dagangan didengar dihadapan Hakim Zabariah.

v Keputusan permohonan pertama oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan untuk dijadikan defenden dibenarkan tetapi hakim menolak permohonan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan untuk memindahkan kes ke Mahkamah Bahagian Dagangan walaupun tidak dibantah Petronas.

vi Kerajaan Negeri sekali lagi merayu terhadap kedua-dua keputusan ke Mahkamah Rayuan.

Walaubagaimana pun kedua-dua rayuan ditolak dan Kerajaan Persekutuan kekal sebagai defenden kedua dan kes akan tetap dibicarakan di Mahkamah Sivil.

vii Kerajaan Negeri mengemukakan permohonan kebenaran merayu kepada di Mahkamah Persekutuan untuk kedua-dua keputusan rayuan yang ditolak di Mahkamah Rayuan. Walaubagaimana pun Mahkamah Persekutuan tidak membenarkan kedua-dua permohonan.

viii Kes kembali ke Mahkamah Tinggi.

Kerajaan Negeri menfailkan pula permohonan untuk mendapatkan dokumen berkenaan semua aktiviti cari gali dan pendapatan daripada pengeluaran Petroleum dari Kelantan.

ix Seminggu selepas itu Petronas telah failkan permohonan untuk melupuskan kes di Mahkamah Tinggi ini dengan mengguna-pakai Aturan 14 A, iaitu perbahasan isu undang-undang tanpa memanggil saksi dan tiada bicara.

x Selepas itu Kerajaan Persekutuan pula menfailkan permohonan yang sama iaitu pendengaran dengan mengguna-pakai Aturan 14 A.

2011

xi Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi telah mendengar permohonan Penzahiran dokumen dan memutuskan bahawa permohonan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan tidak dibenarkan dengan alasan Petronas sudah menfailkan permohonan Aturan 14 A.

2012

xii Pada 18 Januari 2012, Mahkamah Tinggi telah mendengar Permohonan Aturan 14 A oleh kedua-dua pemohon (Petronas dan Kerajan Persekutuan) dan membenarkan kedua-dua permohonan.

xiii Sebulan selepas itu, Kerajaan Negeri telah menfailkan rayuan di Mahkamah Rayuan terhadap keputusan Aturan 14 A.

xiv Pada 26 April 2012, Mahkamah Rayuan telah mendengar ketiga-tiga rayuan oleh Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan. Ia merangkumi pecahan berikut a Penzahiran Dokumen oleh Petronas terhadap semua aktiviti cari gali dan pengeluaran Petroleum Kelantan b Pendengaran menolak Mahkamah Tinggi menggunakan Aturan 14 A oleh Petronas c Pendengaran menolak Mahkamah tinggi menggunakan Aturan 14 A oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan.

xv Pada pendengaran tersebut (26 April), Mahkamah rayuan menolak ketiga-tiga permohonan. Walaubagaimana pun semasa pendengaran di Mahkamah Rayuan, Kerajaan Negeri dimaklumkan secara rasmi penyelesaian luar mahkamah antara Kerajaan Terengganu dengan Petronas dan Kerajaan Persekutuan. Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan pula telah memohon terma-terma penyelesaian tersebut didedahkan.Walaubagaimana pun permohonan sekali lagi ditolak.

xvi Pada 3 Oktober 2012, Pendengaran Permohonan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan untuk mendapatkan kebenaran merayu terhadap ketiga-tiga keputusan tolak di Mahkamah Rayuan pada 26 April. Pendengaran didengar di Mahkamah Persekutuan. Pada hari pendengaran, Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan dimaklumkan bahawa Petronas dan Kerajaan Persekutuan tiada bantahan terhadap ketiga-tiga permohonan tersebut. Oleh itu, Mahkamah Persekutuan memberikan kebenaran merayu kepada Kerjaan Negeri Kelantan.

xvii Dalam masa 14 hari selepas keputusan, Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan boleh menfailkan notis rayuan di Mahkamah Persekutuan. Dianggarkan pendengaran ketiga-tiga rayuan tersebut oleh Mahkamah Persekutuan akan berlangsung ada awal tahun 2013.

xviii Keputusan ini telah dihakimi oleh 5 hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan iaitu Tan Sri Raus Sharif, Tan Sri Amar Maaruf, Datuk Zainun Ali, Datuk Jeffrey Tan dan Datuk Sulong Matjerale.



အႏူေတာထဲက လူေခ်ာ အလိမ္အညာ ဦးသိန္စိန္

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 04:26 AM PDT

From the FB of Duwa Kachin‎>အႏူေတာထဲက လူေခ်ာျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံရဲ႕ သမၼတႀကီး ရာထူးခံယူထားတဲ့ ဦးသိန္စိန္ ၿပီးခဲ့တဲ့ အပတ္အတြင္း အေမရိကန္ရွိ ကုလသမဂြ ခရီးသြားခဲ့တာနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္ၿပီး

ေ၀ဖန္ရမယ္ ဆုိရင္။(၁) ကုလသမဂြမွာ ေျပာခဲ့တဲ့ မိန္႔ခြန္းဟာ ႀကိဳတင္ေရးထားတာ ျဖစ္ၿပီး လူႀကိဳက္မ်ားခဲ့
ပါတယ္။ မိန္႔ခြန္း ေရးေပးေသာ သမၼတ အႀကံေပးမ်ားမဆုိးပါ။(၂) Sanction ရုပ္သိမ္းျခင္းအတြက္ စက္မႈလုပ္ငန္းရွင္မ်ား အိပ္မက္ေကာင္းခဲ့ၿပီ။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ ဗဟုိဦးစီးစနစ္ေၾကာင့္ လယ္သမားမ်ား မ်က္ခုံးလႈပ္ကိန္းဆုိက္ၿပီ။ စီးပြါးေရးပိတ္ဆုိ႔မႈ ရုပ္သိမ္းၿပီး ေနာက္ဆက္တဲြ စက္မႈဇုန္မ်ားအတြက္ လယ္ယာေျမ မသိမ္းဖုိ႔ အေရးႀကီးလာသည္။

(၃) Asia Society, BBC Hardtalk ေတြမွာ ေျဖခဲ့ေသာ အေျဖမ်ားမွာ မေရမရာမ်ားသာ ျဖစ္သည္။ ပုိဆုိးသည္မွာ အလိမ္အညာ ပါေသာေၾကာင့္ ႏုိင္ငံတကာတြင္ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသားမ်ား အထင္ေသးခံရဖြယ္ ျဖစ္သည္။

ႏုိင္ငံတကာ ဆုိရာမွာ အထူးသျဖင့္ သတင္းသမားမ်ားသည္ အေျခအေနမွန္ကုိ ႀကိဳတင္သိထားၿပီး ေမးေသာ ေမးခြန္းမ်ားသာ ျဖစ္သည္။ သူတုိ႔ လုိခ်င္ေသာ အေျဖမွာ မွားရင္မွားခဲ့တယ္… ေျဖာင့္ေျဖာင့္ ၀န္ခံဖုိ႔ျဖစ္သည္။ ပြင့္လင္းမႈ ကုိ တန္ဖုိးထားသည္။ သူတုိ႔ေမးေသာ ေမးခြန္းတုိင္းသည္လဲ စိတ္ဓါတ္ပုိင္း ဆုိင္ရာ စမ္းသပ္မႈ အမ်ားႀကီးပါသည္။

သုိ႔ေသာ္.. ဖုံးဖိၿပီး ၿဖီးဖ်ဲန္းလုိက္ျခင္းသည္၊ ျမန္မာ ႏုိင္ငံသားမ်ား၏ အလိမ္အညာ စရုိက္ကုိ ႏုိင္ငံတကာ ခ်ျပသလုိ ျဖစ္သြားတာကုိ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသားမ်ား အမ်ားပုိင္းသည္ပင္လွ်င္ မသိလုိက္ပါ။

ဒီလုိေျပာလုိက္ရလုိ႔ ဟုတ္လွၿပီ လုိ႔ထင္ေကာင္း ထင္ေနမည္။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ ႏုိင္ငံတကာ ဆုိတာ ကုိယ့္ထက္ အမ်ားႀကီး ျမန္မာ ႏုိင္ငံအေၾကာင္းသိထား သူမ်ား ျဖစ္တယ္ ဆုိတာ မေမ့သင့္ပါ။

နုိင္ငံတကာ အေနနဲ႔ အလုိလုိက္ထားျခင္းမွာ အႏူေတာထဲက လူေခ်ာမုိ႔ ျဖစ္သည္။

ႏုိင္ငံတကာ ႏွင့္ ေရရွည္ စီးပြါးေရး လုပ္ရာတြင္ ယုံၾကည္ႏုိင္ေလာက္တဲ့ စိတ္ေန စိတ္ထား၊ ရုိးေျဖာင့္မႈသည္ အင္မတန္ အေရးႀကီးပါသည္။ ျမန္မာ ႏုိင္ငံသား အားလုံးကုိယ္စား လိမ္ညာေပးလုိက္လုိ႔ ဂုဏ္ယူေနလားေတာ့ မသိပါ။ တကယ္ေတာ့ အရွက္ရျခင္းျဖစ္သည္။

တုိင္းရင္းသားမ်ားအေနနဲ႔လဲ ဒီလုိ လိမ္တတ္တဲ့ ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ဳိးကုိ ဘယ္လုိ ယုံၾကည္ခ်က္ တည္ေဆာက္ႏုိင္မလဲ.. စဥ္းစားစရာပါ…

DVB TV News‎'s ‎status‎.
စစ္အစိုးရလက္ထက္က ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္အပါအ၀င္ ေထာင္နဲ႔ခ်ီတဲ့ႏုိင္ငံေရးသမားေတြကို ဖမ္းဆီးေထာင္ခ်ခဲ့တဲ့ အေပၚ ၀မ္းနည္းေၾကာင္း တရား၀င္ေျပာဆိုဖို႔ သမၼတဦးသိန္းစိန္က ျငင္းဆန္လုိက္ပါတယ္။ ဘီဘီစီကမၻာတလႊားဌာန ၾကီးရဲ႔ နာမည္ၾကီး Hard Talk အစီအစဥ္နဲ႔ ေမးျမန္းခန္းမွာ ဦးသိန္းစိန္က ဒါဟာ ႏိုင္ငံအေတာ္မ်ားမ်ားမွာ ျဖစ္ေလ့ ျဖစ္ထရွိတဲ့ ကိစၥသာျဖစ္ျပီး၊ သူနဲ႔စစ္အစိုးရက တုိင္းျပည္အတြက္ မွန္တယ္ထင္တဲ့ လုပ္ရပ္ကို လုပ္ခဲ့တာျဖ
စ္ေၾကာင္း၊ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကလည္း သူမွန္တယ္ထင္တာကို လုပ္ခဲ့တာသာျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ခုခံေျပာဆုိသြားပါတယ္၊ အဲဒီ့ေနာက္ဆက္ျပိး ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကို ျပည္သူနဲ႔လႊတ္ေတာ္က သမၼတအျဖစ္ ေရြးခ်ယ္မယ္ဆိုရင္ သူ႔အေနနဲ႔ လက္ခံဖုိ႔ အဆင့္သင့္ရွိတယ္လုိ႔ ဆုိပါတယ္။ ဒါေပမဲ့ အဲဒီလို ေရြးခ်ယ္လို႔မရေအာင္ ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံုမွာ ကန္႔သတ္ထားတဲ့ ကိစၥကေတာ့ သူတေယာက္တည္းသေဘာနဲ႔ ေျပာင္းလဲလုိ႔ မရေၾကာင္းလည္း ဥိးသိန္းစိန္က ေျပာၾကားသြားပါတယ္။


Tra la la la Tim Tam!

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 04:19 AM PDT

Hurray!!! Hurray!! It's a Tim Tam Day today!!

Last Friday, a friend/blog reader from Down Under called to inform me that his gift of Tim Tams would be arriving at my doorstep via Pos Laju.

Saturday passed by and no Tim Tams.

And I reminded myself that patience is a virtue that I lack so it had to be Monday. Sunday flew by and soon it was Monday.

But Monday was another Tim Tamless day...:-(

Tuesday came and went with no Tim Tams. :-(

As the seconds, minutes, hours and days passed by, hope diminished.....visions of Tim Tams became blur and I could still hear his voice saying, "You will have enough Tim Tams to last till Christmas."

By then, I had completely lost hope and was in a fix. Even the image of the Tim Tam logo was a blur in my Tim Tam deficient state.

  • If I emailed my friend to tell him that I did not receive the Tim Tams, it would be quite presumptuous because for all I knew, there could have been a glitch and the Tim Tams had not been sent yet.
  • If I did not email him, he might think what a timmytammy ungrateful friend I was not to thank him for the Tim Tam blessings.
My mind went into overdrive. I thought that perhaps the package was lost in transit or worse still, had fallen into the hands of those who are just as timmitammytized as me.

Oh I pictured the scenario....I saw how the Tim Tam deprived culprit ripped open the box, sat in a corner and deliriously ate every single morsel of Tim Tams till he reached Tim Tam heaven.

Then I thought, oh maybe it is good that the Tim Tams did not appear as my diet would be sabotaged but deep inside me, I knew for a fact that I was just consoling myself miserably.

And then the magical toot-toot of the Pos Laju van sounded at my gate. Ooo la la la la la la la la I sang in my heart as I opened the door and rushed to the gate. I bet the delivery man thought I was his secret admirer who finally surfaced judging from the speed at which I ran to him and the broad smile I gave him when I said, "Oh, I have been waiting for you for days! Finally you are here."

Stunned and amused, he asked me to sign but before he could give me the pen, I asked him, "Yang mana saya punya?"

*There were two boxes in the front seat. I thought perhaps it was the smaller box.

To my ecstasy, he pointed to the BIGGER box.

Tra la la la tim tam....tra la la la tim tam...so singeth my heart at that point in time :-)

I signed at breakneck speed, thanked him profusely, carried the box and ran into the house, closed the front door and screamed, "NIIIIIICHOOOOOOLAAAAAASSSSSSS, the Tim Tams are heeeerrrrrrreeeee!!!!"

Confession - when i first saw the initial package - i tot wahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh siau ah - the whole box filled with tim tams? No way. I confess - I was secretly hoping that there would be a year's supply and not three months' supply :-).


Opening the box was a breeze. Carefully, I used a knife to make elegant slits at the openings. Voila! Tim Tams? Oh noooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! Another box??? Aha! My mind went into overdrive again. Good heavens! Don't tell me there are many more boxes and at the end when I reached the final box, will there be only miniature Tim Tams for me? sob sob sob sob  I started to hyperventilate...:-) and tried to open the box as quickly as I could. No more elegant slits!

The Sacred Box of Tim Tams :-)

Nick and I quarrelled when opening the second box. He said I was dumb cos I was cutting it the wrong way.

"Mom, cool down. Your excitement has kind of blinded you to the fact that the flaps overlap. You cannot rip it open," said Nick coolly when he saw me sawing at a gap.

 Actually - me not dumb - just greedy and wanted to rip open the box.

:-(

Most embarrassed, I said, "Nah, you do it."

My calm and collected boy coolly slit at the right places and opened the flaps, one of which had been brutally mutilated by me! And as I looked inside, "Oh nooooooooooooooooo...more tricks????"


Slowly, almost in tears, I rummaged through the newspapers and struck GOLD oops I mean Tim Tams! Voila!


Slowly, I took out each packet of Tim Tams. It was beyond my wildest dreams. Twelve packets of Tim Tams!!!


Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you to the Provider and Guardian Angel of Tim Tams!!!! God bless you and your Timtammiest kindest and most generous heart!!!!

Since there are twelve packets of Tim Tams, the loving mother that I am *coughs* immediately kept aside three packets for Jon.

And then I proceeded to enforce my newly created Tim Tam rules.

The Tim Tam Rules

Each member of the family is custodian to three packets of Tim Tams.

Anyone who wants to savour another flavour must exchange what one has with the person who owns the coveted flavour.

:-)

This rule will ensure that:

a) I, the greatest Tim Tam enthusiast of all in my household, will not eat everything. History shows this has happened time and time again over the years since I am in the house most of the time and the greatest Tim Tam connoisseur.

b) I do not put on weight.

c) None of us get constipation as Tim Tams can be quite heaty.

d) We do not end up fighting, indulging in denials such as "No, I did not eat the Tim Tam" or "It was not me who ate it." or accusations like "Who ate my Tim Tams without my permission?"

With these rules, peace reigneth in the household :-)

Anyway, I am sorry I sound kind of mad in this post. Er....it is because I am high with Tim Tams having devoured one piece of Tim Tam Turkish Delight and one Tim Tam Double Coated Delight.

If you don't mind, please excuse me because it is time for another Tim Tam :-).


အြန္လိုင္းတြင္ ျမန္မာ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားကို မမွန္သတင္းျဖင့္ အပုပ္ခ်ခံရ

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 02:41 AM PDT

"ဒီလို လူလိမ္ေတြ က မီဒီယာမွာ လုပ္ေတာ့ အဲဒီမီဒီယာ အဆင့္က သြားျပီေပါ့"
အြန္လိုင္းတြင္ ျမန္မာ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားကို မမွန္သတင္းျဖင့္ အပုပ္ခ်ခံရမႈ ေဒါက္တာ ျမင့္သိန္း ရွင္းလင္း >အထူးသတင္း ျမန္မာမြတ္စလင္မ္သတင္း ♦♦♦ ၀၃ ေအာက္တိုဘာလ ၂၀၁၂

ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံသား အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားအေနျဖင့္ အျခားႏိုင္ငံတစ္ခုႏွင့္ စစ္ျဖစ္လွ်င္ မည္သည့္ႏိုင္ငံဘက္မွ ပါမည္နည္း ဟူေသာ ေမးခြန္းကို ျမန္မာ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားအား ေမးျမန္းရာ ေျဖဆိုႏိုင္ျခင္းမရွိဟု ႏိုင္ငံေရးပါတီ တစ္ခုမွ ဥကၠ႒တစ္ဦး၏ အမည္ျဖင့္ ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္တြင္ ေရးသားခ်က္ႏွင့္ အျခားသူမ်ားက ၎ကိုကိုးကား ေဖာ္ျပခဲ့ၾကျခင္းမွာ လံုး၀ မွားယြင္းေၾကာင္းႏွင့္ သတင္းမွာ လိမ္လည္မႈႀကီးတစ္ရပ္ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ျမန္မာ မြတ္စလင္မ္ ကြန္ရက္မွ ေဒါက္တာ ျမင့္သိန္းက myanmarmuslim.net ၏ ဆက္သြယ္ ေမးျမန္းခ်က္တစ္ရပ္တြင္ ေျဖၾကားသည္။

စက္တင္ဘာ ၁၆- ၁၇ ရက္ေန႔ တြင္က်င္းပသည့္ National Identity and Citizenship in 21st Century Myanmarဖိုရမ္တြင္ ၀င္ေရာက္ ေဆြးေႏြး သူမ်ားအနက္ ေဒါက္တာ ျမင့္သိန္း၊ ဦးေက်ာ္မင္းႏွင့္ ဦးေအာင္ကိုကို္တုိ႔ ၃ ဦးမွာ အစၥလာမ္ ဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားျဖစ္သည္။ အဆိုပါ ဖိုရမ္ ဒုတိယေန႔တြင္ ေဒါက္တာျမင့္သိန္းႏွင့္ ဦးေက်ာ္မင္းတို႔ ေဆြးေႏြးေျဖၾကားစဥ္ မတူကြဲျပားျခင္းႏွင့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးပါတီ၊ ဥကၠ႒ေနမ်ဳိးေ၀က ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္က ခိုး၀င္တဲ့ သူေတြနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္လို႔ ဘယ္လို သေဘာထား ပါသလဲ ဟူေသာ ေမးခြန္း၊ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္နဲ႔ စစ္ျဖစ္ရင္ ဘယ္လိုရပ္တည္မလဲ ဟူေသာ ေမးခြန္းကို အထက္ပါ အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္ ၂ ဦးအား ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္သံ အမတ္အပါအ၀င္ ပရိတ္အစံုေ႐ွ႕တြင္ ေမးျမန္းခဲ့ေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။

အထက္ပါ ေမးျမန္းခ်က္ကို အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္ ပညာရွင္ႏွစ္ဦးက ေျဖၾကားႏိုင္ျခင္းမရွိဟု မတူကြဲျပားျခင္းႏွင့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးပါတီ ဥကၠ႒ ေနမ်ဳိးေ၀ အမည္ၿဖင့္ ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ေရးသားထားေၾကာင္း 7Days ဂ်ာနယ္ သတင္းေထာက္ အခ်ဳိ႕ႏွင့္ အစၥလာမ္ ဆန္႔က်င္ေရး ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာမ်ား၊ သတင္းဌာနမ်ားတြင္ အဆင့္ဆင့္ ကိုးကားေဖာ္ျပခဲ့သည္။
မတူကြဲျပားျခင္းႏွင့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးပါတီ ဥကၠ႒ ေနမ်ဳိးေ၀ အမည္ၿဖင့္ 7Days ဂ်ာနယ္ သတင္းေထာက္၏ ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ေရးသားထားေသာ အစၥလာမ္ ဆန္႔က်င္ေရး ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္စာမ်က္ႏွာ

မတူကြဲျပားျခင္းႏွင့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးပါတီ ဥကၠ႒ ေနမ်ဳိးေ၀ အမည္ၿဖင့္ 7Days ဂ်ာနယ္ သတင္းေထာက္၏ ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ေရးသားထားေသာ အစၥလာမ္ ဆန္႔က်င္ေရး ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္စာမ်က္ႏွာ

"ျပည္တြင္း ျပည္ပက လူေတြရွိတယ္။ Record ရွိတယ္၊ ဒါကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔ မေျဖပါဘူးလို႔ေျပာတာ၊ တကယ့္လိမ္လည္မႈႀကီးပဲ၊ ျမန္မာစကား နားမလည္တာလား၊ လိမ္တာလားေတာ့ မေျပာတတ္ဘူူး"ဟု ေဒါက္တာ ျမင့္သိန္း(စာေရးဆရာၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းလုလင္)က ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာမ်ားတြင္ လိမ္လည္၀ါဒျဖန္႔ျခင္းကို တုန္႔ျပန္ေျပာၾကားသည္။

အြန္လိုင္းမီဒီယာတြင္ လုပ္ၾကံ၀ါဒျဖန္႔ပံုႏွင့္ ဆန္႔က်င္ဘက္အျဖစ္ ေမးခြန္း ၂ ခုလံုးကို ရွင္းလင္းျပတ္သားစြာျဖင့္ အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္ ပညာရွင္ ၂ဦးလံုးက ေျဖၾကားခဲ့ေၾကာင္း အထက္ပါ ပုဂိၢဳလ္ကပင္ ေျပာသည္။

ကၽြန္ေတာ့္ကို ေမးတဲ့အခါ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္တင္မကဘူး၊ ဘယ္က၀င္၀င္ လက္မခံတဲ့အေၾကာင္း၊ ၀င္လာၿပီးတဲ့သူ ေတြမွာေတာ့ ဥပေဒအရ Refugee Status ရွိတဲ့အေၾကာင္းေျဖပါတယ္။ နံပါတ္ ၂ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္နဲ႔ စစ္ျဖစ္ရင္ (ဆိုတဲ့ ကိစၥမွာေတာ့) ဘာျဖစ္လို႔ စစ္ျဖစ္ရမွာလဲလို႔ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ျပန္ေမးတယ္။ (ၿပီးေတာ့) စစ္မျဖစ္ေအာင္ ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔ ၀ိုင္း၀န္းရမယ္။(လို႔ေျဖတယ္)၊ ျဖစ္ခဲ့ေသာ္ ကၽြန္ေတာ္တို႔ဟာ ကိုယ္သစၥာ ခံယူထားတဲ့ႏိုင္ငံမွာပဲ သစၥာရွိစြာ ပါ၀င္မယ္ဆိုတာကို ျပတ္ျပတ္သားသားေျဖခဲ့တယ္"ဟု ေဒါက္တာျမင့္သိန္း(ျမန္မာမြတ္စလင္မ္ကြန္ရက္)က myanmarmuslim.net ၏ ဆက္သြယ္ေမးျမန္းခ်က္ တစ္ရပ္တြင္ ေျဖၾကားသည္။

ထုိ႔အျပင္ ၁၉၉၀ ခုႏွစ္ အမတ္ေဟာင္း ဦးေက်ာ္မင္း အေနျဖင့္လည္း အထက္ပါ ေမးခြန္းႏွစ္ရပ္လံုးတြင္ မိမိကဲ့သို႔ ပင္ ရွင္းလင္း ျပတ္သားစြာ ေျပာၾကားခဲ့ျခင္းကို ၾကားခဲ့ရပါေၾကာင္းလည္း ေဒါက္တာျမင့္သိန္းက ဆက္လက္ ေျပာၾကားသည္။

ထုိကဲ့သို႔ မတူကြဲျပားျခင္းႏွင့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးပါတီ ဥကၠ႒ အမည္ျဖင့္ ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္တြင္ အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္တို႔အား အမ်ားျပည္သူ အထင္အျမင္ လြဲမွားေစရန္ လိမ္လည္တင္ျပခဲ့ျခင္းကို 7Days ဂ်ာနယ္ အႀကီးတန္း သတင္း ေထာက္ ဥကၠာကိုကို (ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ အမည္၊ အဘဥကၠာကိုကို) အပါအ၀င္ သတင္းေထာက္ အခ်ဳိ႕ႏွင့္ အြန္လိုင္း၊ မီဒီယာအခ်ိဳ႕တြင္ အဆင့္ဆင့္ ကိုးကားေဖာ္ျပခဲ့သည္။ 7Days ဂ်ာနယ္ အႀကီးတန္း သတင္းေထာက္ ဥကၠာ ကိုကိုသည္ သတင္းေထာက္ တစ္ဦးေစာင့္ထိန္းရမည့္ က်င့္၀တ္သိကၡာကို ေျပာင္ေျပာင္တင္းတင္း ခ်ဳိးေဖာက္ကာ ၎၏ေဖ့စ္ဘုတ္ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ႐ိုဟင္ဂ်ာလူမ်ဳိးအား ႏွိမ့္ခ်ခ်ဳိးႏွိမ္ ေျပာင္ေလွာင္ သေရာ္မႈမ်ားကို မၾကာခဏ လုပ္ေလ့ရွိသည့္ ရခိုင္လူမ်ဳိး သတင္းေထာက္ တစ္ဦးျဖစ္သည္။

လူတစ္ဦး၏ စကားကိုသာ ကိုးကား၍ မွတ္တမ္း အေထာက္အထားမ်ားကို လ်စ္လ်ဴ႐ႈကာ ကိုးကားေဖာျ္ပျခင္း သည္ မီဒီယာက်င့္၀တ္ႏွင့္ ကိုက္ညီမႈမရွိ႐ံုမွ်မက ကြန္ျမဴနတီ ၂ ခုအၾကား အထင္အျမင္ လြဲမွားမႈကို တိုးပြား ေစၿပီး ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္တည္ေဆာက္ေရးကိုသာမက မီဒီယာအေပၚ ျပည္သူ၏ ယံုၾကည္အားထားမႈ ကိုပါ ထိခိုက္ႏိုင္ ေၾကာင္းလည္း ေဒါက္တာျမင့္သိန္း(ျမန္မာမြတ္စလင္မ္ကြန္ရက္)က ထပ္ေလာင္းေျပာၾကားသည္။

ဒါ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေရး ကိစၥအဆင့္မဟုတ္ဘူး။ တစ္ႏိုင္ငံလံုးက်ယ္က်ယ္ျပန္႔ျပန္႔ျဖစ္ေနတဲ့ ကြန္ျမဴနတီ ကိစၥ၊ တစ္တိုင္းျပည္လံုး ရဲ႕ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ တည္ေဆာက္ေရးနဲ႔လည္း ဆိုင္တယ္။ အုပ္စုေတြ အမ်ားႀကီးပါတယ္။ ဒါကို လြယ္လြယ္ေလးနဲ႔ လူတစ္ေယာက္ေျပာတဲ့ စကားေပၚမွာ လိုက္ေရးတယ္ဆိုတာ မီဒီယာက်င့္၀တ္နဲ႔လည္း မညီဘူးလို႔ ထင္ပါတယ္။ ပိုဆိုးတာက တိုင္းျပည္မွာ နစ္နာစရာေတြ ၾကံဳမယ္၊ ကြန္ျမဴနတီ ၂ ခုအၾကား အထင္အျမင္လြဲမွားမႈေတြ ၾကံဳမယ္။ ဒီကြန္ဖရင့္ရဲ႕ ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္ကိုက Better Nation ထူေထာင္ဖို႔၊ စိတ္ေစတနာ သန္႔သန္႔နဲ႔ ပါ၀င္ေဆာင္ရြက္ဖို႔၊ ေတြ႕ဆံုေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့ၾကတာျဖစ္တယ္။ ဒီလို Record လုပ္ထားတဲ့ သတင္းကို ေတာင္ ေျပာင္းျပန္ ေျဗာင္လိမ္ရဲရင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံမွာ က်န္တဲ့သတင္းေတြေရာ၊ ရခိုင္သတင္းေတြ အေပၚမွာပါ မီဒီယာေတြ အေပၚဘယ္ေလာက္ အားထားလို႔ရမွာလဲ" ဟု ေဒါက္တာျမင့္သိန္း(ျမန္မာမြတ္စလင္မ္ ကြန္ရက္) က အၿပီးသတ္ေျပာၾကားသည္။

ေနမ်ိဳးေဝ မူရင္းလင့္ခ္
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=455219604522789&set=a.250780178300067.62082.100001042591094

အဘဥကၠာကိုကို မူရင္းပိုစ္လင့္ခ္
https://www.facebook.com/oakkarkoko/posts/4053425247508
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=455219604522789&set=a.250780178300067.62082.100001042591094



Mashitah, Dua Lagi Diarah Fail Pembelaan Saman FITNAH Ust. Hadi

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 04:39 AM PDT

Mahkamah Tinggi di sini hari ini mengarahkan Timbalan Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Dr. Mashitah Ibrahim dan dua lagi untuk memfailkan pernyataan pembelaan mereka berhubung kes saman fitnah oleh Presiden Pas, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, sebelum 30 Oktober ini.

Tarikh tersebut turut ditetapkan oleh Hakim Datin Zabariah Mohd. Yusof untuk pengurusan kes berkenaan.

Hadir pada prosiding hari ini ialah peguam, Nur Diana Mat Radzai bagi pihak Abdul Hadi selaku pihak plaintif, manakala kesemua defendan diwakili peguam-peguam, Abang Azlan Abang Ariffin dan Zunita Kamaruzaman.

Menurut saman yang difailkan pada 18 September lalu, Ahli Parlimen Marang itu menamakan Mashitah defendan pertama sementara penerbit dan pencetak akhbar Sinar Harian, Sinar Karangkraf Sdn. Bhd. (Sinar Karangkraf) dan Ultimate Print Sdn. Bhd. (Ultimate) masing-masing defendan kedua dan ketiga.

Abdul Hadi dalam pernyataan tuntutannya mendakwa, defendan pertama telah mengeluarkan kata-kata berunsur fitnah terhadapnya dalam kolum beliau 'Langit Terbuka' yang kemudiannya diterbit dan dicetak oleh defendan kedua dan ketiga pada 2 Mac lalu.

Dakwanya, kata-kata fitnah yang ditulis itu antara lainnya menunjukkan bahawa plaintif adalah seorang yang tidak bermoral dan tidak layak untuk menjadi pemimpin parti.

Tindakan Sinar Karangkraf dan Ultimate menerbit dan mencetak artikel terbabit tanpa usul periksa pula didakwa bertujuan untuk mensensasikan berita dan melariskan jualan bagi mendapatkan faedah kewangan.

Perbuatan kesemua defendan itu didakwa Abdul Hadi telah menyebabkan beliau menanggung aib dan malu serta dipandang hina oleh masyarakat.

Walaupun telah memohon kesemua defendan menarik semula pernyataan fitnah terbabit, meminta maaf dan membayar ganti rugi melalui surat peguam bertarikh 20 Jun lalu, Abdul Hadi mendakwa, pihak defendan telah cuai, gagal atau mengabaikan permintaannya.

Oleh itu, Abdul Hadi memohon ganti rugi am, teladan dan teruk yang tidak dinyatakan jumlahnya, kos serta relif-relif lain yang difikirkan sesuai oleh mahkamah.

Plaintif turut menuntut kesemua defendan menarik semula pernyataan fitnah tersebut dan meminta maaf di muka hadapan akhbar Utusan Malaysia dalam tempoh 24 jam selepas perintah dikeluarkan oleh mahkamah.


ေဌးလြင္ဦး “မြတ္ဆလင္ေတြကို သတ္ဘို႔ ညီၫြတ္သြားသလား?”

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 02:01 AM PDT

Source: မြတ္ဆလင္ေတြကို သတ္ဘို႔ ညီၫြတ္သြားသလား။ ေဌးလြင္ဦး

ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအတြင္း မြတ္ဆလင္မ်ားဟာ အျခားလူမ်ားကဲ့သို႔ သာမန္လူေတြပဲ ျဖစ္တယ္။ အျခားသူေတြလို႔ သြားလာလႈပ္ရွား လုပ္ကိုင္စားေသာက္တယ္။ တစ္မူထူးေနသူမ်ားမဟုတ္။ အႏုပညာ စိတ္၀င္စားသူ၊ ဘာသာ ေရးစိတ္၀င္စားသူ၊ စီးပြားေရး စိတ္၀င္စားသူ၊ သတင္းစာနယ္ဇင္းစိတ္၀င္စားသူ၊ ႏိုင္ငံေရး စိတ္၀င္စားသူ အမ်ိဳး မ်ိဳးအဖံုဖံု- အမ်ားနည္းတူ ပါပဲ။
ဒါေပမယ့္ ျမန္မာ့ သမုိင္းအဆက္ဆက္မွာ မြတ္ဆလင္မ်ားက တက္လာသမွ် အစိုးရမ်ားကို အႀကီးအက်ယ္ ေတာ္လွန္ဆန္႔က်င္ၿပီး ဦးတည္တိုက္ခိုက္မယ့္ အဖြဲ႔အစည္းႀကီးမ်ိဳး ထူေထာင္ခဲ့ျခင္း မရွိ၊ ထူေထာင္ထားျခင္း မရွိ။ ျမန္မာမြတ္ဆလင္မ်ားဟာ အျခားသူမ်ားလို- NLD ပါတီမွာ ၀င္ခဲ့သူ၊ ပါ၀င္ေနဆဲသူ ေတြရွိတယ္။ ႀကံ႔ခိုင္ေရး အသင္းအဖြဲမွာလည္း ပါ၀င္ခဲ့သူ၊ ပါ၀င္ေနဆဲသူမ်ား ရွိေနတယ္။ ABSDF မွာလည္း ပါ၀င္ခဲ့သူ၊ ပါ၀င္ေနဆဲသူမ်ား ရွိေနပါတယ္။ အရံမီးသတ္၊ ၾကက္ေျခနီ အဖြဲ႔ေတြက အစ အားလံုးမွာ ျမန္မာျပည္ထဲက အျခားေသာ ျမန္မာ ႏိုင္ငံသားမ်ား နည္းတူပါပဲ။
ဒါေပမယ့္ စစ္အစိုးရကို အလိုမရွိ ဆိုၿပီး စစ္တပ္ကို ဦးတည္တိုက္ခိုက္၊ ၿဖိဳခြဲဘို႔ ဦးေဆာင္ပါတီႀကီး တစ္ခု အျဖစ္ မြတ္ဆလင္ထဲက ဖြဲ႔စည္းခဲ့ျခင္း မရွိ။ စစ္အစိုးရ ယႏၱရားႀကီး တစ္ခုလံုးကို ၿပိဳပ်က္သြားေစဘို႔ ဦးေဆာင္လုပ္တဲ့ အဖြဲ႔အစည္းမရွိ။ ၂၀၀၈ အေျခခံဥပေဒကို အလိုမရွိ၊ လက္မခံ လို႔ ဦးေဆာင္ေအာ္ဟစ္ခဲ့တာ မရွိ။ လႊတ္ေတာ္ထဲ မွာ စစ္တပ္က ၂၅ ရာႏႈန္း ေနရာယူထားတာကို ေထာက္ခံပါတယ္၊ သို႔မဟုတ္ ကန္႔ကြက္ပါတယ္လို႔ မြတ္ဆလင္ ေတြက ဦးေဆာင္ ေျပာဆိုခဲ့တာ မရွိပါ။
၁၉၈၈ အေရးအခင္း ၿပီးကတည္းက စစ္တပ္ကိုေသာ္လည္းေကာင္း၊ စစ္အစိုးရကိုေသာ္လည္းေကာင္း၊ ၂၀၀၈ အေျခခံဥပေဒကို ေသာ္လည္းေကာင္း၊ အစဥ္တစ္စိုက္ ဆန္႔က်င္ေတာ္လွန္ခဲ့တဲ့ အဖြဲ႔အစည္းႀကီးမွ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ မ်ားကိုယ္တိုင္က ၂၀၁၂ ခုႏွစ္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအတြင္း မြတ္ဆလင္သုတ္သင္ေရး အမႈအခင္းႀကီးကို ေခါင္းေရွာင္တဲ့ အခါမွ "မိမိတို႔သည္ စစ္တပ္နဲ႔ ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္ရမည္"ဟု ေႂကြးေၾကာ္လာမႈမွာ – အေတာ္ကို အံ့ၾသဘို႔ ေကာင္းတဲ့ ညီၫြတ္မႈ တစ္ရပ္ ျဖစ္ေနပါတယ္။
အခ်ိဳ႔စကားလံုးမ်ားဟာ ဒီမိုကေရစီကို ဦးေဆာင္ေနပါတယ္ ဆိုသူမ်ားရဲ႔ ပါးစပ္က ေျပာတဲ့ စကားအစစ္မ်ားလား၊ လို႔ေတာင္ သံသယ ျဖစ္ဘြယ္ ရွိေနပါတယ္။ အဲ့ဒီ ပုဂၢိဳလ္မ်ား အေနနဲ႔ အမွန္တစ္ကယ္ပဲ ျမန္မာစစ္တပ္ကို အားကိုးအားထား ျပဳပါသလား။ သို႔မဟုတ္ဘဲ မြတ္ဆလင္သုတ္သင္ေရး အတြက္သာ စည္းလံုးညီၫြတ္လိုက္ တာလား ဆိုတာေတာ့ ပညာတတ္သူတိုင္း နားလည္ ခံစားႏိုင္ပါတယ္။
အမွန္တစ္ကယ္ အဲ့ဒီ ဒီမိုကေရစီ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ႀကီးမ်ား အေနနဲ႔ စစ္တပ္၊ စစ္သည္မ်ားကို အားကိုးအားထား ရွိေနခဲ့ရင္- ၂၀၀၈ ဖြဲ႔စည္းပံု အေျခခံဥပေဒကို ဘာေၾကာင့္ ေျပာင္းခိုင္းဘို႔ လုိပါသလဲ။ စစ္တပ္က လႊတ္ေတာ္ ေနရာ ၂၅ ရာႏႈန္း ယူထားတာကို ဘာေၾကာင့္ ေျပာင္းလဲဘို႔ ႀကိဳးစားေနပါသလဲ။ သမၼတနဲ႔ ဒုသမၼတ ရာထူးမ်ား ကို စစ္တပ္ဘက္ဆိုက္က ယူထားတာကို ဘာေၾကာင့္ ေျပာင္းလဲဘို႔ ႀကိဳးစားေနပါသလဲ။ ဒီလို အာဏာမက္တဲ့ အခါမွာေတာ့- စစ္တပ္ဟာ၊ သို႔မဟုတ္ စစ္တပ္ဘက္ဆိုက္ဟာ ရန္သူ ျဖစ္ေနပါသလား။
စစ္တပ္ဟာ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအတြက္ တစ္ကယ္အေရးပါတဲ့ က႑က ရွိကို ရွိရမယ့္လို႔ အမွန္တစ္ကယ္ ခံစားယံု ၾကည္ထားရင္- စစ္တပ္က ႀကီးမႈးေရးဆြဲတဲ့ ၂၀၀၈ အေျခခံဥပေဒကိုလည္း ျပဳျပင္ေနစရာ မလိုပါ။ စစ္တပ္ဘက္ ဆိုက္မွ လႊတ္ေတာ္ ၂၅ ရာႏႈန္း ယူထားတာကိုလည္း ေျပာင္းလဲပစ္ဘို႔ ႀကိဳးစားေနဘို႔ မလိုပါ။ နည္းေတာင္ နည္းေနေသးတယ္ ဆိုၿပီး လႊတ္ေတာ္ရဲ႔ ၇၅ ရာႏႈန္းကို စစ္တပ္ဘက္ဆိုက္ကို ေပးလိုက္သင့္ပါတယ္။
ဒီလိုမွ မဟုတ္ရင္ေတာ့— ျမန္မာ့ဒီမိုကေရစီ ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ားဟာ မြတ္ဆလင္ သုတ္သင္ေရးမွာသာ စစ္တပ္ကို ထိုးခ် ေပါင္းသင္းၿပီး-၊ မြတ္ဆလင္မ်ား မ်ိဳးျပဳတ္သြားရင္ စစ္တပ္က မ်ိဳးျပဳတ္တရားခံ အျဖစ္ ကမၻာ့ခံုရံုးကိုတက္ လိုက္ေတာ့- ၿပီးေတာ့ ႏုိင္ငံရဲ႔ အာဏာကို ငါတို႔ကို ေပးခဲ့ ဆိုတဲ့ ပံုစံမ်ိဳးကိုသာ ေဆာင္ေနေၾကာင္း ထင္ရွားေနပါ ေတာ့တယ္။
ငါတို႔ အာဏာရမွ ငါတို႔က လုပ္ေပးႏိုင္မွာ၊ ဒါေၾကာင့္ ငါတို႔ကို အာဏာ အရင္ေပးပါ ဆိုတဲ့ သေဘာထားမ်ိဳးကို လည္း ေတြ႔ေနရျပန္ပါတယ္။ အာဏာမက္သူ ဆိုတာနဲ႔ အမ်ိဳးသားေခါင္းေဆာင္၊ လူထုေခါင္းေဆာင္ ဆုိတာ မတူညီပါ။ အာဏာမက္သူ ဆိုတာ မိမိ မဲ အမ်ားစု ရရႏိုင္ဘို႔ မွန္မွန္မွားမွား လူမ်ားစုရဲ႔ အလိုက် လိုက္ေျပာ တယ္၊ ဘယ္ေလာက္မွန္မွန္ လူနည္းစုဘက္က ရပ္တည္ေပးရင္ လူမ်ားစုဆီက မဲေတြ ပ်က္ကြက္သြားမွာကို ေၾကာက္ရြံ႔တယ္။ မိမိရဲ႔ အနားမွာလည္း သြက္လက္ထက္ျမက္တဲ့ လူမ်ားကို ေနရာေပးေလ့မရွိဘဲ- အင္မတန္ တံုးအသူမ်ား၊ လူၿဗိန္းမ်ားကိုသာ ထားေလ့ရွိတယ္။ ႏိုင္ငံတစ္ႏိုင္ငံလံုးရဲ႔ အမ်ိဳးသားေခါင္းေဆာင္ဆိုတာ ႏိုင္ငံ တြင္းရွိ လူအားလံုးၾကားမွာ အမွန္တရားဘက္က ရပ္တည္တယ္။ အမွန္တရားအတြက္ ေျပာရဲဆိုရဲတယ္၊ မိမိ အာဏာ (ေနရာ) ထက္ အမွန္တရားကိုပဲ ၾကည့္တယ္။ မိမိ အနားမွာလည္း အႀကံေပးႏိုင္သူ၊ ထက္ျမက္ၿပီး ပညာတတ္သူမ်ားကို ထားေလ့ရွိတယ္။
ျမန္မာျပည္သူမ်ား မိမိတို႔ရဲ႔ အနာဂါတ္ အတြက္ ဆင္ျခင္ေတြးေတာ ႏိုင္ပါေစလို႔ ဆႏၵျပဳပါတယ္။
ေဌးလြင္ဦး


Pilihanraya Kampus UIA: Pro Mahasiswa Menang Besar

Posted: 03 Oct 2012 01:01 AM PDT

Calon pro-Mahasiswa menggondol kesemua 26 kerusi dalam dalam pengundian semula yang dijalankan secara manual hari ini di kampus Universiti Islam Antarabangsa.

Seorang jurucakap kumpulan mahasiswa itu, Mohd Hafizuddin M Noor berkata, pengaruh pro-Mahasiswa meningkat di kampus itu dengan pertambahan tiga lagi kerusi, berbanding 23 kerusi pada tahun lalu.

Menurutnya, calon yang menang itu, termasuk 12 kerusi di kampus UIA Kuantan, diumumkan oleh wakil jawatankuasa pilihan raya kampus masing-masing di setiap fakulti.

Baki lima kerusi merupakan kerusi untuk calon antarabangsa.

UIA merupakan kubu terakhir yang dimenangi oleh pro-Mahasiswa.

Sebelum ini mereka memenangi pilihan raya di kampus Universiti Malaya dan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Pengundian semula hari ini dijalankan selepas keputusan pada hari pengundian 25 September digantung ekoran masalah teknikal apabila jumlah undi direkodkan melebihi jumlah mahasiswa keluar mengundi. -mk

Pilihan raya UIA: Pro-Mahasiswa dakwa menang

SHAH ALAM - Kumpulan Pro-Mahasiswa menyapu bersih kesemua kerusi kawasan fakulti Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) dalam pilihan raya semula yang berlangsung semalam.

Pengundian semula menggunakan sistem manual.

Menurut Pengerusi Pro-Mahasiswa Nasional, Edikoup Lakip Sediyanto, kesemua kerusi yang diperuntukkan bagi kawasan kuliah dimenangi Pro-Mahasiswa.

"Kami sapu bersih semua 26 kerusi kawasan fakulti daripada 31 kerusi yang diperuntukkan UIAM.

"Baki lima kerusi lagi merupakan kawasan Antarabangsa," katanya ketika dihubungi Sinar Harian Online.

Pengumuman keputusan dibuat Timbalan Dekan Hal Ehwal Pelajar setiap fakulti bermula jam 8.15 malam di Kompleks Sukan Lelaki, UIAM.

Keputusan semalam menjadikan Pro-Mahasiswa menguasai tiga institusi pengajian tinggi awam (IPTA) termasuk Universiti Malaya dan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia manakala Pro-Aspirasi pula menguasai 17 IPTA.

Bagaimanapun Pro-Aspirasi juga mendakwa mereka memenangi pilihan raya kampus UM.

Sementara itu, Penolong Pengarah Perhubungan Media dan Promosi UIAM, Suki Ahmad berkata, kaunter pengiraan undi tambahan dibuka untuk mempercepatkan proses pengiraan.

"Kami jangka pengumuman akan tamat sekitar 12 malam tetapi ia berjaya diselesaikan lebih cepat dari yang dijangka. "Malah, ia berjalan lancar tanpa sebarang provokasi," katanya ketika dihubungi.

Tambahnya, "pengiraan undi bermula sekitar jam 6.30 petang." UIAM mempertandingkan 31 kerusi di kedua kampusnya.

Sebelum ini, UIAM mengumumkan pengundian semula selepas berlaku kesilapan teknikal pada sistem e-undi yang digunakan.
-SH


TENA Malaysia Disability Equality Training – Sin Chew – 13 September 2012

Posted: 02 Oct 2012 11:00 PM PDT

This article on the TENA Malaysia "Rediscover Dreams" Disability Equality Training (DET) workshop was published in Sin Chew Daily. The workshop was held at Black Box, MAP@Publika on 2 September 2012. Thanks to Leonard Lim, Senior Marketing Manager of SCA Hygiene Marketing (M) Sdn. Bhd., for sharing this copy with me.

Article in Sin Chew Daily on DET workshop held at Black Box, MAP@Publika
Click on image for larger version.

Related posts:

  1. Rintihan OKU: Famili – Berita Harian – 7 September 2012
  2. Disability Equality Training (DET) At SOCSO
  3. Disability Equality Training (DET) For Tena Malaysia
  4. Disability Equality Training (DET) At Universiti Sains Malaysia
  5. Training of Trainers – Disability Equality Training 2007


Breathe...and Live Again..

Posted: 02 Oct 2012 11:05 PM PDT



[PENIPUAN LAGI] Kerajaan Disyaki "Hilangkan" Penyata Hutang Dari Laporan Bajet 2013

Posted: 02 Oct 2012 10:43 PM PDT

Penyata kedudukan hutang negara disyaki 'dihilangkan' dalam laporan Bajet 2013 dan tidak dinyatakan seperti biasa yang dikemukakan setiap tahun.

Ahli Parlimen PKR Indera Mahkota, Azan Ismail berkata, laporan penyata tentang kedudukan kewangan, hutang, memorandum jaminan kerajaan dan akaun yang melibatkan dana amanah didapati tidak dinyatakan dalam laporan bajet 2013.

"Sangat pelik dan tidak pernah berlaku laporan mustahak sebegini tidak dinyatakan seperti tahun-tahun sebelumnya.

"Perkara ini penting bagi membolehkan ahli Parlimen menelitinya dan membahaskan sebelum belanjawan ini diluluskan dalam Dewan," katanya kepada pemberita di lobi Parlimen di sini hari ini.

Katanya, unjuran angka termasuk bon dan sukuk itu sangat penting kerana boleh memberikan gambaran semasa tentang keyupayaan kewangan negara dan kebolehan kerajaan untuk memberikan peruntukan tambahan seperti Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M) untuk meringankan beban rakyat.

Beliau turut mempersoalkan sama ada kehilangan penyata hutang negara ini berkaitan dengan Laporan Ketua Audit yang sengaja dikeluarkan lewat dua minggu selepas Belanjawan dibentangkan.

"Perkara ini boleh diteliti dengan melihat aliran hutang semasa negara tapi malangnya buat pertama kali Menteri Kewangan gagal menyatakannya.

"Kerajaan mesti bertanggungawab jelaskan kenapa perkara ini berlaku," katanya.

Misteri Kehilangan Item Penting Dalam Buku Anggaran Perbelanjaaan Persekutuan 2013




KUALA LUMPUR, 2 OKT: Ketiadaan beberapa item penting yang wajib ada dalam buku Anggaran Perbelanjaan Persekutuan 2013 menimbulkan tanda tanya samada wujud keadaan kerajaan Umno-BN mahu menyembunyikan sesuatu.

Antara item penting yang hilang ialah kedudukan Penyata Kewangan Pada 31 Disember 2012, Kumpulan Wang Berkanun Kerajaan Bagi Anggaran Kumpulan Wang Seperti 31 Disember 2012 dan Penyata Hutang Awam dan Jaminan Seperti 31 Disember 2012.

Menurut Ahli Parlimen Indera Mahkota, Azan Ismail penyata-penyata tahunan itu sebelum ini tidak pernah gagal dimasukkan dalam buku Anggaran Perbelanjaan Persekutuan.

"Ini adalah penyata yang sangat penting dan saya tak fikir ia berlaku tanpa disengajakan.

"Bila penyata ini hilang, tentulah menimbulkan tanda tanya adakah kerajaan cuba menyembunyikan sesuatu," kata Azan dalam sidang media yang diadakan di lobi parlimen hari ini.

Dalam sidang media tersebut, Azan turut menunjukkan buku Anggaran Perbelanjaan Persekutuan tahun sebelumnya yang mengandungi laporan-laporan hilang itu.

Beliau turut menuntut kerajaan Umno-BN agar bertanggungjawab dan harus memberikan jawapan atas ketiadaan penyata penting itu.

Anggaran Perbelanjaan Persekutuan 2013 diedarkan kepada Ahli Parlimen bagi memudahkan mereka membuat rujukan dan semakan terhadap Belanjawan 2013 yang dibentangkan Jumaat lalu.

Turut berada dalam sidang akhbar sama, Ahli Parlimen Kelana Jaya, Gwo Burne-Loh
.


When Swiss Cows Can Text Owners ....

Posted: 02 Oct 2012 07:35 PM PDT

This morning, I came across an eye-opening article by John Tagliabue in The New York Times about how Swiss cows can text owners from smartphones to announce they are in heat. The detector fixed to the cow's neck has a SIM card so that the owner can pay for the calls. A joke? Nope. Consider the following excerpt:

 Swiss Cows Send Texts to Announce They're in Heat
by John Tagliabue


 When Christian Oesch was a boy on his family's hog farm, cellphones were a thing of the future. Now, Mr. Oesch tends a herd of dairy cattle and carries a smartphone wherever he goes. Occasionally he gets an SMS from one of his cows.



That is because Mr. Oesch, 60, who cares for a herd of 44 Red Holstein and Jersey dairy cows, is helping to test a device that implants sensors in cows to let farmers know when they are in heat. When that is the case, the device sends an SMS to the farmer's phone. The Swiss do not settle for half measures: the SMS can be in any one of Switzerland's three main languages — German, French and Italian — plus English or Spanish.

If there is anything to be learned from this project, which will bring the devices to market early next year, it is that Heidi's world of goats — or cows — placidly grazing in Alpine meadows is gradually becoming the stuff of storybooks.

The electronic heat detector is the brainchild of several professors at a technical college in the nearby Swiss capital of Bern. It fills a market gap, they say, because dairy cows, under growing stress to produce larger quantities of milk, are showing fewer and fewer signs of heat. That makes it harder for Swiss farmers to use traditional visual inspections to know when to bring on the bull or, in about 80 percent of the cases these days, the artificial inseminator.

The sensor implanted in the genitals of Fiona or Bella (favorite names for Swiss cows) measures body heat, then transmits the result to a sensor affixed to the cow's neck that measures body motion. (Cows in heat become restless.) "The results are combined, using algorithms, and if the cow is in heat an SMS is sent to the farmer," said Claude Brielmann, a computer specialist who helped design the system. The detector on the cow's neck is equipped with a SIM card so the farmer can pay for the calls.

"Our recognition rate is about 90 percent," Mr. Brielmann said.

The device, known as a heat detector, raises concerns among animal rights advocates, not so much because of its intrusiveness in the private parts of the cow — its use involves inserting a thermometer with a tiny transmitter and antenna in the cow's genitals — but because of what it says about the stressful lives of Swiss cows. It also prompts skepticism among dairy farmers, who are startled by its cost, which is expected to be at least $1,400 per unit. 

CLICK HERE for the rest of the entry.


No comments: