- voter education videos
- [BERGAMBAR] Rakaman Terindah & Terhodoh Semasa Penamaan Calon Semalam
- Touching the heart of Malaysian Race Relations
- ၾကားျဖတ္သတင္း၊ သိၾကားမင္း မ်က္ေစ့လည္ စိတ္ဆိုးေနျခင္း
- ဒုကၡသည္ ကူညီေစာင့္ေရွာက္ေရး လုပ္ေဆာင္ေနသူ၏ ဓာတ္ပံုအား အင္တာနက္တင္၍ ျခိမ္းေျခာက္ေန
- Arnoud van Doorn, Politikus Belanda Yang Anti Islam Akhirnya Memeluk Islam
- ၀ီရသူ မၾကာမွီ သီရိလကၤာသို႔သြားျပီ ဗုဒၶဘာသာအၾကမ္းဖက္အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားႏွင့္ ေတြ႕ဆံုမည္ဟုသိရ
- The Nation, the Party or the Individual - Who Reigns?
- ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံက အိမ္ရွင္အျဖစ္ လက္ခံက်င္းပမည့္ Davis Cup တင္းနစ္ၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို လံုၿခံဳေရး အေျခအေနေၾကာင့္ ေရႊ႕ဆိုင္းခဲ့ရ
- OIC Urges UN Action on Burma Muslims
- Ramai Calon Bertembung Di Pasar Pagi Untuk Temu Rakyat
- OIC Blasts Burma Govt
- 1970 Luyechuns with Win Oo
- ေမတၱာစစ္ ေမတၱာမွန္ဆိုတာ ဘာသာ လူမ်ိဳးဆိုတဲ့ နယ္စည္း မျခားရပါဘူး
- O BN..Please laah..Grow Up!
- လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကို ခ်ဳိးေဖာက္ဖို႔မ်ား စဥ္းစားေနရင္ တိုင္းျပည္ပါပ်က္သြားႏိုင္တယ္ဆိုတာ နားလည္ေစခ်င္တယ္
- NUS probing tweets with confidential patient info
- Muhyiddin & TV3 Kantoi Menipu Rakyat
- Nomination day in Bukit Mertajam on GE13
- Where or how to get Malaysian tax rebates
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 09:40 AM PDT
before you vote, please be educated! important facts and information to be aware of as a voter.
bersih, tindak malaysia and durian fm.com had get together to produce some interesting videos for you to be aware of your voter's rights and to lean more about voting. there are all together 12 videos. these videos are well made with humour thrown in. this is good as it will make ordinary people understand it easier. do share the videos with your family and friends. you can even use the videos to organise a session to show to people (e.g. school, church, college, organisations, companies).
i'm highlighting here two videos which i find very funny and interesting. if you click here for the first video, you will be able to see all the 12 videos.
episode 3a: indelible ink issue
episode 5a: the hidden dot
the other videos are:
episode 1: voters education by ambiga
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 11:12 AM PDT
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 06:52 AM PDT
Zaid said: "the Ketuanan Melayu model has failed." This is because "it has resulted in waste of crucial resources, energy and time and has distracted from the real issues confronting the country."
Citing the rise of Muhkriz Mahahir (who considered judicial reforms threats to Malays) as a sign of UMNO leaning to the right, he said such trend would mean "more inefficiency, more corruption and a more authoritarian style of government." He further said; "We are a deeply divided nation, adrift for our having abandoned democratic traditions and the rule of law in favour of a political ideology that serves no one save those who rule."
To cope with globalization, Zaid calls for Malays to discard Ketuanan Melayu and re-embrace democracy and the rule of law to spur an economic renaissance of reviving innovation and creativity through co-operation and competition.
Predictably, UMNO's reaction to Zaid's speech was a chorus of abusive language from its leaders, ranging from "traitor to his race" to "apologize and repent, or get out of rumpun Melayu (Malay group)". And characteristically, none of these vocal critics engaged Zaid on any substance of his wide-ranging speech, which also touched on religion, judiciary, the economy etc., true to UMNO's traditional role as a bully good at telling people to shut up but unable to articulate why.
UMNO has not only told Zaid to shut up, but his speech has also been largely blacked out by the local press, which is another manifestation of how tightly the press has been controlled to shield the incumbent power from any unfavourable exposure.
That UMNO has not the slightest intention to carry out any reform that may alter the status quo of entrenched racism and corruption is evident not only from its angry rejection of Zaid Ibrahim's speech, but also from the thumping support given to party ultras in the current round of nominations for leadership post for the coming party election, signaling a resurgence of the Mahathirist type of rule, and needless to say, more Ketuanan. BN component parties, which cherished false hope of political survival through a reformed UMNO, would therefore be well advised to take note of this development.
UMNO's rejection aside, this Zaid speech must be studied by all Malaysians, for it touches the bottom line of race relations, which have given us so much heartache and headache in the past and yet still proved to be elusive for a proper solution even to this day.
At the heart of the issue is racial equality. This may be a non-issue in most countries in the world, where racial equality is taken for granted, but not in Malaysia. Due to historical factors, and due to the intertwining of race and religion and economic disparity among the races, racial equality is a sensitive subject in Malaysia.
Suffice it to say that all races recognized the need for some kind of affirmative action in favor of the Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak as they were conspicuously lagging in the educational and economic field at the earlier stage of our nationhood, hence the birth of NEP.
However, the problem arose when UMNO/BN became too powerful and ruled without any checks and balances. That bred unbridled racism and corruption in UMNO, and the NEP, in addition to being used to uplift educational and economic level of Malays, was hijacked to enrich party leaders and cronies, who used it abundantly as master key to open up all kinds of channels to state wealth. As UMNO's hegemony grew, and through mass indoctrination, many had come to regard NEP privileges as birth rights of Malays, though this belief is fallacious.
The line between constitutional rights and the privileges derived from a political agenda such as the NEP has thus become blurred and indistinguishable. It has deteriorated to the point that even a cabinet minister (Amirsham Aziz) was unable to answer a question from Lim Kit Siang in Parliament on Oct 29 as to whether the NEP could be equated with Article 153 of the Constitution, which provides for the special position of Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak. The answer is: no.
It might be thus asked: is there racial equality under our constitution? The answer is yes, as this is clearly and unambiguously guaranteed under Article 8 and other articles of the Constitution. The existence of Article 153 does not detract from this guarantee. The racial privileges granted under Article 153 are limited to the provision of quotas. And these quotas, which fall in the fields of public service, education and commerce are meant as protective measures, and are to be applied to the extent deemed necessary and reasonable by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. One must also understand that Article 153 mandates the Agong to safeguard not only the special position of Malays and natives of Sabah and Sarawak, but also the legitimate interests of other communities.
It will be seen from a study of our constitution that many racial privileges and racial discriminations couched under the umbrella of NEP that have been implemented by BN, particularly those accorded to party leaders and cronies, are extra-constitutional.
Then, should Malays worry when NEP is removed as suggested by the oppositionPakatan Rakyat coalition? Certainly not, affirmative action programs will continue to be implemented, except that these are need-based instead of race-based, which should engender more equitable distribution, promote justice, enhance national unity and eliminate abuses. The anticipated result of this policy should see ordinary Malays enjoying more benefits as the money that would otherwise have been leaked through massive corruption and cronyism could be redirected to the needy.
To UMNO's recalcitrant leaders who are hell-bent to cling on to this racial supremacist ideology for their personal political survival, they should realise that such racial ideology has already become extinct since South Africa abandoned its apartheid policy two decades ago. It has no place in this globalised world. It is an affront to universal values, besides conflicting with fundamental values of all religions including Islam. Finally, it is detrimental to common Malays for whose interests these leaders have professed to champion, as continued racial hegemony will require increased repression which in turn will cause more political unrest and further economic retardation. In such a downward spiral, no community will be spared.
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 06:20 AM PDT
သေရာ္စာ — 16 April 2013
ယခုႏွစ္ ၁၃၇၄ ခုႏွစ္ (၁+၃+၇+၄=၁၅)(၁+၅=၆) အတာသၾကၤန္ ကာလအတြက္ သိၾကားမင္းက လူ႔ျပည္ဆင္းရာတြင္ လူ႔ျပည္မေရာက္မွီ ၆ မိုင္ အေရာက္တြင္ ဠင္းတ ၆ ေကာင္ ေႏွာက္ယွက္သျဖင့္ မဂၤလာအခ်ိန္ထက္ အနည္းငယ္ေနာက္က် ေရာက္႐ွိ လာခဲ့ပါသည္။ ယင္းသို႔ သတ္မွတ္ခ်ိန္အတြင္း မဆင္းသက္နိင္၍ စိတ္မသက္မသာ ျဖစ္ေနခ်ိန္တြင္ ႀကိဳဆိုေနၾကသည့္ အလံမ်ားမွာ ခါတို္င္းႏွင့္မတူဘဲ ၉၆၉ ဂဏန္းမ်ား (၉+၆+၉=၂၄ ၊၂+၄=၆) မ်ားပါ၀င္ေနရာ သိၾကားမင္းမွာ ေနရာမွား ဆင္းသလားပာု မ်က္ေစ့လည္ေနေၾကာင္းသတင္းရ႐ွိပါသည္။
ပို ၍မ်က္ေစ့လည္သြားသည္မွာ သိၾကားမင္းနတ္ျပည္က လွမ္းၾကည့္စဥ္က မိတၳိလာႏွင့္ပဲခူးတိုင္း အေနာက္ျခမ္းတြင္ မီး႐ိႈ႔႕ျခင္း၊ ဖ်က္ဆီးျခင္း၊ လူသတ္ျခင္း ဦးေဆာင္ခဲ့သူမ်ားက ယခု သိၾကားမင္းလူ႕ျပည္ေရာက္ေသာအခါ ကယ္ဆယ္ေရး လုပ္ငန္း လူႀကီးမ်ား အျဖစ္ေတြ႕ေနရျခင္း ျဖစ္သည္။ အစိုးရအဖြဲ႔၀င္အခ်ိဳ႕ ေၾကာင္သူေတာ္ လုပ္ေနၾကသည္။
သာသနာ့ အလံသည္လည္း ဠင္းတ ၆ ေကာင္ (၉၆၉) တက္ခဲ့ၿပီ။ ဗုဒၶဘာသာမိန္းကေလးမ်ားလည္း ေဖၚရင္းခၽြတ္ရင္းႏွင့္ အမ်ိဳးေပ်ာက္ေတာ့မည္။ အလဇၥ်ီရဟန္းတစ္စုတုိ႔ေၾကာင့္ ဘုရားသာသနာလည္း ပ်က္ၿပီ၊ သိၾကားသာသနာလည္းပ်က္ၿပီ၊ဗုဒၶဘာသာ၀င္ ဆိုသူမ်ားဘီလူးစိတ္ေပါက္ေနၿပီျဖစ္သျဖင့္ အခ်ိန္မွီ မထိန္းသိမ္းက မၾကာမွီ ငလွ်င္ဒဏ္ခံၾကရေတာ့မည္။
သူတပါး အသက္ အိုးအိမ္စည္းစိမ္ကို ဖ်က္ဆီးသျဖင့္ တရားေစာင့္နတ္တို႔က မေက်နပ္ၾကေတာ့ဘဲ သဘာ၀ေဘး အႏၱယ္မ်ားျဖင့္ ဆံုးမၾကေတာ့မည္။ ယခုႏွစ္ သႀကၤန္ေရတြင္ မိတၳိလာတြင္ မတရားသတ္ျဖတ္ခံခဲ့ရသူ ဘာသာျခားတို႔၏ေသြးမ်ား မိဘမဲ့ႏွင့္ မုဆိုးမ၏မ်က္ရည္မ်ား ၊ ဒုကၡသည္တုိ႔၏ မ်က္ရည္မ်ား ေရာေႏွာပါ၀င္ေနေၾကာင္း သိၾကားမင္း စစ္ေဆးေတြ႔႐ွိရာ ဗမာလူမ်ိဳးႏွင့္ ဗုဒၶဘာသာတို႔၏ အလားအလာ မေကာင္း၊ သိၾကားမင္း စိတ္႐ႈပ္ေမာၿပီး အတက္ေန႔ မဂၤလာ အခ်ိန္မေရာက္မွီ ျပန္တက္ေတာ့မည္ ဆိုေနသည္။အစိုးရႏွင့္ျပည္သူက ၉၆၉ ႏွင့္ ဘီလူးစိတ္မ်ား သုတ္သင္႐ွင္းလင္း မႈမျပဳပါက ေနာင္ႏွစ္ သိၾကားမင္းဆင္းခ်င္မွ ဆင္းေတာ့မည္ ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ေလာကပါလ နတ္မင္းက မီဒီယာမ်ားသို႔ေျပာေၾကာင္း သိ႐ွိရပါသည္။
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 06:07 AM PDT
၂၀၁၃ ခုႏွစ္၊ မတ္လ (၂၀)ရက္ေန႔တြင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအလယ္ပိုင္း မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕တြင္ ဘာသာေရးအၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမ်ား စတင္ျဖစ္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။
ဘာသာေရးအၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမ်ား ျပဳလုပ္ႏိုင္ရန္ အစဆြဲထုတ္ခံခဲ့ရသည့္ေနရာျဖစ္ေသာ နယူး၀ိန္႔စိန္ ေရႊဆိုင္အား မတ္လ (၂၀)ရက္ေန႔ ေန႔လယ္ (၁၂း၃၀)နာရီအခ်ိန္တြင္ စတင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ခံခဲ့ရပါတယ္။
ယင္းအခ်ိန္မွစတင္၍ ျမိဳ႕နယ္တြင္း လူမႈေရးလုပ္ငန္းမ်ား၌ တက္ႂကြစြာ ပါ၀င္ေဆာင္ရြက္ေနသူ ကို– သည္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ ဖ်က္ဆီးခံေနရသည့္ ေရႊဆိုင္၏ အနီးတ၀ိုက္တြင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈျဖစ္စဥ္မ်ားအား တာ၀န္သိ ျပည္သူတစ္ဦးအေနျဖင့္ မွတ္တမ္းရယူေနခဲ့စဥ္ ေန႔ (၂း၁၅)အခ်ိန္၌ အၾကမ္းဖက္သမားမ်ား၏ အုပ္စုဖြဲ႕ ရိုက္ႏွက္ခံရၿပီး။၃း၃၀နာရီခန္႔တြင္မိတၳီလာေဆးရံုႀကီးသို႔ ရဲ၀န္ထမ္းအကူအညီျဖင့္ တင္ပို႔ခဲ့ရပါသည္။
တုတ္မ်ားျဖင့္ အုပ္စုဖြဲ႕ ၀ိုင္း၀န္း ရိုက္ႏွက္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ခံရမႈေၾကာင့္ ကို– မွာ မ်က္ႏွာတစ္ခုလံုးႏွင့္ခႏၶာကုိယ္အႏွ႔ံ ဒဏ္ရာမ်ား ရရွိခဲ့ေၾကာင္း သိရပါတယ္။
အဆိုပါ ကို–မွာ ေဆးရံုတြင္ ေဆးကုသမႈခံခံယူေနစဥ္ ၎ေနထိုင္သည့္ရပ္ကြက္မီးေလာင္သည့္သတင္းေၾကာင့္ က်န္ရစ္ခဲ့သည့္ မိသားစုမ်ားအား စိတ္ပူကာ ည (၇)နာရီအခ်ိန္ခန္႔တြင္ ေဆးရံုမွ သက္ဆိုင္ရာဆရာ၀န္၏ ခြင့္ျပဳခ်က္ျဖင့္ ေနအိမ္သို႔ ျပန္ေရာက္ခဲ့ေၾကာင္း စံုစမ္းသိရွိရပါတယ္။
၎ ကို–သည္ ဒဏ္ရာမ်ားျဖင့္ ေနအိမ္သို႔ ျပန္ေရာက္ခဲ့ၿပီးေနာက္ အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမ်ားမွာ ဆက္လက္ႀကီးထြားလာျခင္းေၾကာင့္ မိသားစုအားလံုး ေနအိမ္မွ စြန္႔ခြါ၍ ထြက္ေျပးခဲ့ၾကရတယ္လို႔ သိရပါတယ္။
အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမ်ား ပိုမိုႀကီးထြားလာခဲ့ၿပီး မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕ႀကီးမွာ ပ်က္စီးသြားခဲ့ရၿပီးေနာက္ပိုင္း မြတ္စလင္မ္အမ်ားစုပါ၀င္သည့္ ေထာင္ေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသာေဒသခံမ်ားမွာ ဒုကၡသည္ဘ၀ျဖင့္ ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းမ်ားသို႔ ေရာက္ရွိခဲ့ရာတြင္ ၎ကို–မွာ မိမိဒဏ္ရာမ်ားေၾကာင့္ အနားမယူႏိုင္ေတာ့ဘဲ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ား ကူညီေစာင့္ေရွာက္ေရးအတြက္ သက္ဆိုင္ရာတာ၀န္ရွိသူမ်ား၊ ေရႊ၀ါေရာင္သံဃာေတာ္မ်ား၊ NLD အဖြဲ႕မ်ား၊ မႏၲေလးဘာသာေပါင္းစံု ေစတနာရွင္ လူငယ္အဖြဲ႕၊ စစ္ကိုင္းလူမႈကူညီေရးအသင္း၊ ေရႊဘိုေစတနာရွင္အဖြဲ႕၊ ရန္ကုန္ေစတနာရွင္အဖြဲ႕တို႔ႏွင့္ ပူးေပါင္း၍ ဘာသာမခြဲျခားဘဲ အမွတ္(၁၆) အေျခခံပညာမူလတန္းရွိ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းအပါအ၀င္ ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းမ်ားသို႔ စြမ္းစြမ္းတမံျဖင့္ လိုက္ပါလွဴဒါန္းကူညီေပးေနေၾကာင္း သိရပါတယ္။
ယခုအခါ ၎ကို–အား YeYint Thway ဟူေသာ အမည္ရသည့္ အင္တာနက္ facebook စာမ်က္ႏွာတစ္ခုတြင္ ၎၏ဓာတ္ပံုႏွင့္တကြ ဘုန္းႀကီးအား သတ္ျဖတ္သူဟူ၍ လုပ္ၾကံသတင္းတစ္ခုအား ျဖန္႔ေ၀ခဲ့ေသာ္လည္း အမည္မွာ မွားယြင္းေနေၾကာင္း သိရပါတယ္။
ယင္းလုပ္ၾကံသတင္းအား ျဖန္႔ေ၀သူ၏ စာမ်က္ႏွာအား ေလ့လာၾကည့္ရာ ထိုစာမ်က္ႏွာပိုင္ရွင္မွာ မည္သူမည္၀ါျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သဲကြဲစြာ ေဖာ္ျပမထားသည့္အျပင္ ၎တင္ထားသည့္ ပို႔စ္မ်ားအား ျပန္လည္၍ Share ေ၀မွ်ထားသည့္ အႀကိမ္ေရ ေထာင္ေက်ာ္ရွိေနၿပီး ၎တင္ထားသည့္ ပို႔စ္အား Like လုပ္ရန္လည္း ပိတ္ပင္ထားျခင္းေၾကာင့္ လုပ္ခြင့္ရသူ ၃ ဦးသာရွိေနေၾကာင္း ေလ့ေလာေတြ႕ရွိရပါတယ္။ အဆိုပါ ၃ ဦးမွာ `ဗမာ့ သား´ `ခက္ ထန္´ ႏွင့္ `Marn Htan Myo´တို႔ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း ေလ့လာေတြ႕ရွိရပါတယ္။
၎တို႔၏ subdomain အမည္မ်ားကေတာ့…
ထို႔ေၾကာင့္ ပညာရွင္တစ္ဦးက ယခုလို သံုးသပ္ပါတယ္။ သတင္းလုပ္ၾကံ ျဖန္႔ေ၀သူ ရဲရင့္ေသြးဟူေသာ အေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္မွာ အသက္ (၃၀)ေက်ာ္အရြယ္ ျဖစ္ႏိုင္ၿပီး၊ ဗမာ့သား အေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္အမည္ရင္းမွာ ေအာင္မ်ိဳးေဇာ္ျဖစ္ႏိုင္သလို၊ ခက္ထန္သည္ မင္းနႏၵကိုယ္(ေခၚ)ရခိုင္အဆိုေတာ္အိန္အိန္းအမည္ရသူျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သတင္းမ်ား ထြက္ေပၚခဲ့ဖူးပါတယ္။ မာန္ထါန္မ်ိဳးအေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္ကေတာ့ `မြတ္စလင္မ္ေတြအားလံုးကိုသတ္ျပစ္ခ်င္တယ္´ဟု ေရးသားထားပါတယ္။
အဆိုပါသံုးဦးရဲ႕ အင္တာနက္စာမ်က္ႏွာမ်ားအား အေသးစိတ္ေလ့လာၾကည့္ရာ ဗမာ့သား အေကာင့္တြင္ ယမန္ေန႔က က်ေရာက္ခဲ့သည့္ သမၼတဦးသိန္းစိန္၏ ေမြးေန႔အတြက္ သမၼတရံုးညႊန္ၾကားေရးမွဴး ဗိုလ္မွဴးေဇာ္ေဌး၏ အင္တာနက္စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ေဖာ္ျပထားေသာ သမၼတဦးသိန္းစိန္အား ဂုဏ္ျပဳေရးထိုးထားသည့္ Graffiti (လမ္းေဘး နံရံေဆးမႈတ္)ပန္းခ်ီဆြဲထားသည့္ ဓာတ္ပံုအား ေဖာ္ျပထားၿပီး၊ သမၼတဦးသိန္းစိန္၏ ေမြးေန႔ပြဲအား ဂုဏ္ျပဳစာမ်ားမ်ိဳးစံု ေရးသားေဖာ္ျပထားတာကို ေတြ႕ရွိရျခင္းေၾကာင့္ သမၼတႏွင့္ စစ္အုုပ္စုအား အျပည့္အ၀ ေထာက္ခံသူျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သိရွိရပါတယ္။
မာန္ထါန္မ်ိဳးအေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္၏ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ အစၥလာမ္ဆန္႔က်င္ေရးစာမ်ားအား အသားေပး ေဖာ္ျပထားၿပီး ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္အား ေ၀ဖန္းထားျခင္း၊ သမၼတ၏ ေျပာေရးဆိုခြင့္ပုဂၢိဳလ္ ျပန္ၾကားေရး ဒု၀န္ႀကီး ဦးရဲထြဋ္၏ ဓာတ္ပံုႏွင့္ ပို႔စ္မ်ားအား တဆင့္ျပန္လည္ ေဖာ္ျပထားတာကို ေတြ႕ရွိရပါတယ္။
ခက္ထန္အေကာင့္ကေတာ့ ရခိုင္လူငယ္တခ်ိဳ႕၏ ဓာတ္ပံုမ်ားႏွင့္ စာမ်ားအား ေဖာ္ျပထားသည္ကို ေတြ႕ရွိရျခင္းေၾကာင့္ ရခိုင္လူမ်ိဳးျဖစ္ႏိုင္ပါသည္။ ၎ခက္ထန္သည္ မၾကာမီရက္ပိုင္းမ်ားကတည္းက ဘာသာေရးအၾကမ္းဖက္မႈမ်ားအတြက္ စနစ္က်စြာ ပံုေဖာ္ခဲ့ေသာ ရခိုင္အဆိုေတာ္ အိန္အိန္းျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သတင္းမ်ား ထြက္ေပၚခဲ့ဖူးသူ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
သတင္းလုပ္ၾကံ ျဖန္႔ေ၀သူ ရဲရင့္ေသြးအေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္ကေတာ့ မိတၳီလာကိစၥႏွင့္သက္ဆိုင္သည့္စာမ်ားအား အသားေပး ေဖာ္ျပထားၿပီး အစၥလာမ္ဆန္႔က်င္ေရးမ်ားကိုလည္း ေဖာ္ျပထားပါတယ္။ ၎၏ စာမ်က္ႏွာသည္ မၾကာေသးမီ လပိုင္းအတြင္းက စတင္ဖြင့္လွစ္အသံုးျပဳခဲ့သည္ဟု ယူဆရၿပီး အေစာဆံုး အသံုးျပဳသည့္အခ်ိန္ျဖစ္ေသာ ၂၀၁၂ ခုႏွစ္၊ ေအာက္တိုဘာလ (၂၄)ရက္ ေန႔စြဲျဖင့္ `မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕၏ ကုရ္ဘာနီအီးဒ္ပြဲေတာ္ကိစၥ´ကို ေဖာ္ျပခဲ့သည္ကို ေလ့လာေတြ႕ရွိရၿပီး၊ မတ္လ (၁၂)ရက္ေန႔တြင္ တူရ္ကီသခ်ႋဳင္းကိစၥအေၾကာင္းျပ၍ အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားအား ကန္႔သတ္ပိတ္ပင္ေစရန္ ၿမိဳ႕နယ္အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္ေရးမွဴးထံ ေပးပို႔ထားသည့္စာအား တင္ျပေပးထားပါတယ္။
အဆိုပါ YeYint Thway (ရဲရင့္ေသြး)အေကာင့္ပိုင္ရွင္ႏွင့္ ထိုသံုးဦးတို႔၏ ဆက္စပ္မႈမွာ မည္သိုရွိေၾကာင္း ေလ့လာသံုးသပ္ဖို႔ လိုအပ္လာပါတယ္။ ၎ ရဲရင့္ေသြးမွာ မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕ခံတစ္ဦးျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေသာ္လည္း အၾကမ္းဖက္ခံရသူ ကို– ၏ အမည္အား မွားယြင္းသံုးစြဲထားေသာေၾကာင့္ ေဒသခံ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားႏွင့္ ဆက္စပ္မႈမရွိေသာ မြတ္စလင္မ္မုန္းတီးေရး ပုဂၢိဳလ္တစ္ဦးျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သံုးသပ္လို႔ ရႏိုင္မည္ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ား၏ ေနထိုင္သြားလာမႈမ်ားအား ေလ့လာစံုစမ္းေနသူ ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္းလည္း မိတၳီလာရွိ ဒုကၡသည္ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ား သြားလာမႈမ်ားအား ၎၏ စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ အေသးစိတ္နီးပါး တင္ျပထားျခင္းကို ၾကည့္ျခင္းျဖင့္ သံုးသပ္ႏိုင္မည္ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ၎အျပင္ အၾကမ္းဖက္ရိုက္ႏွက္ခံရသူ ကို–၏ ဓာတ္ပံုမွာ အၾကမ္းဖက္မခံရမီ နာရီပိုင္းအလိုက လူအုပ္ၾကားထဲရွိေနစဥ္ ရိုက္ယူထားသည့္ပံု ျဖစ္ျခင္းေၾကာင့္လည္း သိႏိုင္ပါတယ္။
၎စာမ်က္ႏွာႏွင့္ မိတ္ဖြဲ႕ Friend လုပ္ထားသူေပါင္း ဧၿပီ(၂၀)၌ (၁၈)ေယာက္ရွိေနၿပီး စာရင္းထဲ၌ `ဘြရွင္´အမည္ျဖင့္ အသံုးျပဳေနသည့္ တပ္မေတာ္အရာရွိ ရခိုင္လူမ်ိဳး ဗိုလ္မွဴးအဆင့္ရွိသူ ျမတ္သိန္းထြန္း၊ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ အစြန္းေရာက္ 969 အၾကမ္းဖက္ဂိုဏ္းေခါင္းေဆာင္ ၀ီရသူ၊ ၿပီးခဲ့သည့္ ၾကားျဖတ္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲတြင္ မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕၏ တစ္သီးပုဂၢလကိုယ္စားလွယ္အျဖစ္ ၀င္ေရာက္ယွဥ္ၿပိဳင္ရာ ရႈံးနိမ့္ခဲ့သည့္ ေဒၚျမင့္ျမင့္ေအးတို႔ ပါ၀င္ေနေၾကာင္း ေတြ႕ရွိရပါတယ္။
အဆိုပါ ေဒၚျမင့္ျမင့္ေအး၏ Myint Myint Aye အင္တာနက္စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ရဲရင့္ေသြးမွ ၂၀၁၂ ခုႏွစ္ ဒီဇင္ဘာလ (၁)ရက္ေန႔က စာအခ်ိဳ႕ တင္ခဲ့တာကို ေတြ႕ရျခင္းျဖင့္ ၎တို႔ႏွစ္ဦးမွာ နီးစပ္ခင္မင္သူမ်ားျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း သံုးသပ္ႏိုင္ပါတယ္။
ၾကားျဖတ္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲတြင္ NLD ပါတီမွ ဦး၀င္းထိန္အား ရႈံးနိမ့္ခဲ့ရသည့္ ေဒၚျမင့္ျမင့္ေအးသည္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲ ၀င္ေရာက္ယွဥ္ၿပိဳင္စဥ္က DVB သတင္းဌာနတြင္ မိမိအား ၿဖိဳးေ၀လမ္း၌ မဲဆြယ္စည္းရံုးေနစဥ္ ကုလားမ်ားမွ ခဲႏွင့္ပစ္ေပါက္သည္ဟု ေျဖၾကားခဲ့သူျဖစ္ျခင္းေၾကာင့္ မြတ္စလင္မ္မုန္းတီးသည့္ပုဂၢိဳလ္တစ္ဦး ျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေၾကာင္း မွတ္ခ်က္ျပဳလို႔ရမည္ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
မည္သူတို႔က မည္သည့္အတြက္ မည္သည့္ရည္ရြယ္ခ်က္ျဖင့္ မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕ႀကီးအား ဖ်က္ဆီးခဲ့သည္ကို မည္သူမွ် အေျဖမထုတ္ႏိုင္ေသးမီကာလ၀ယ္ တန္ဆာခံအျဖစ္ အျပစ္မဲ့သူေတြအား ေထာင္ဒဏ္မ်ား အသီးသီး ခ်မွတ္ခံလိုက္ၾကရၿပီး၊ ရာေပါင္းမ်ားစြာေသာသူေတြဟာလည္း မရႈမလွ ၾကက္ကေလး ငွက္ကေလးမ်ားသတ္ျဖတ္သလို လြယ္ကူစြာ သတ္ျဖတ္လိုက္ၾကတဲ့ အျဖစ္အပ်က္ ဗြီဒီယိုေတြအား ေတြ႕ျမင္ၾကရမွာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
ဤအျဖစ္သႏွစ္မ်ားအား မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားအေနျဖင့္ ခါးသီးစြာျဖင့္ ႀကိတ္မွိတ္၍ သည္းခံမ်ိဳသိပ္ရင္း ဒုကၡသည္စခန္းမ်ားသို႔ ထြက္လာခဲ့သည္ကိုပင္ ေနာက္ကြယ္မွ ႀကိဳးကိုင္လႈပ္ရွားသူ လက္မည္းႀကီးမ်ားသည္ ေက်နပ္မႈမရွိေသးဘဲ၊ အေတာမသတ္ႏိုင္ေသးဘဲ ယခုကဲ့သို႔ အျပစ္မရွိသည့္ လူမႈဖြံ႔ၿဖိဳးေရးလုပ္ေနသူမ်ားအား အျပစ္မရွိဘဲ အျပစ္ရွိသေယာင္ လိမ္လည္လွည့္ျဖား၍ အင္တာနက္တြင္ ေလွ်ာက္ဖြေနျခင္းသည္ သာမန္အခ်ိန္တြင္ အေထြအထူးေျပာဆိုစရာမရွိေသာ္လည္း ယခုကဲ့သို႔ ဘာသာေရး အစြန္းတရားမ်ားေၾကာင့္ လူသတ္ သတ္ျဖတ္ရန္ ေသြးႂကြ စိတ္ဆာေနသည့္အခ်ိန္မ်ိဳး၌ အခ်ိန္ကိုက္ လုပ္ေဆာင္လိုက္ျခင္းမွာ ထို ကာယကံရွင္၏ အသက္အႏၲရာယ္အတြက္ ျခိမ္းေျခာက္ေနသလို ျဖစ္ေနပါတယ္။
ဓာတ္ပံုပိုင္ရွင္ ကို–အား လုပ္ၾကံ၍ သတင္းလႊင့္ေနသူသည္ အမွန္တကယ္တမ္း မည္သူမည္၀ါဆိုသည္ကို အေသအခ်ာ သိမည္မဟုတ္ဟူသည္အား အမည္အား မွားယြင္းေရးသားထားသည္ကို တင္ျပထားၿပီး ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ေနာက္ထပ္ တင္ျပလိုက္တာကေတာ့ အဆိုပါ ဓာတ္ပံုမွာ ကို–အား အၾကမ္းဖက္ ရိုက္ႏွက္ျခင္းမခံရမီ လူအုပ္ၾကားတြင္ ရိုက္ယူထားသည့္ ပံုျဖစ္ေနျခင္းျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ဤကဲ့သို႔ လုပ္ၾကံသတင္းလႊင့္၍ လူတစ္ေယာက္အား ျခိမ္းေျခာက္ရန္ ႀကိဳတင္ၾကံစည္ထားသေလာဟူသည့္ေမးခြန္းအား ထုတ္ရေတာ့ပါလိမ့္မယ္။
အဆိုပါကဲ့သို႔ဖြထားသည့္သူမ်ားအေနျဖင့္ အမွန္တကယ္တမ္း လူဆိုးတစ္ဦး၊ ဘုန္းႀကီးအား သတ္ျဖတ္သူတစ္ဦးဟု အတိအက် သိရွိထားပါက အင္တာနက္မွ ဖြေနမည့္အစား သက္ဆိုင္ရာ ဌာနတြင္ တရားဥပေဒကို ေလးစားလိုက္နာေသာအားျဖင့္ လူကိုယ္တိုင္ထြက္ကာ အမႈဖြင့္ျခင္း၊ သတင္းေပးျခင္း၊ သက္ေသႏွင့္တကြ တိုင္ၾကားျခင္းမ်ား ျပဳလုပ္သင့္ေၾကာင္း အၾကံျပဳခ်င္ပါတယ္။
ေနာက္ဆံုး တင္ျပလိုတာကေတာ့ အဆိုပါ ဓာတ္ပံုပါ ကို–သည္ အင္တာနက္တြင္ ဖြထားသကဲ့သို႔ မည္သည့္ေနရာသို႔မွ် ထြက္ေျပးတိမ္းေရွာင္ေနျခင္းမရွိတာေၾကာင့္ ကၽြႏ္ုပ္တို႔ အလင္းမ်က္၀န္းမီဒီယာ၏ စီေဂ်သတင္းေထာက္မ်ားကိုယ္တိုင္ သိရွိလိုသည့္အခ်က္မ်ားကို မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕၏ ဒုကၡသည္မ်ား ကယ္ဆယ္ေရးႏွင့္ ေနရာျပန္လည္ ခ်ထားေရးရံုးခ်ဳပ္တြင္ ကာယကံရွင္အား ေတြ႕ဆံုေမးျမန္းႏိုင္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ထို႔အျပင္ လံုျခံဳေရး၀န္ထမ္းမ်ားႏွင့္လည္း ေတြ႕ဆံုေမးျမန္းခြင့္ ရခဲ့ၿပီး ဓာတ္ပံုမ်ားလည္း ရိုက္ယူႏိုင္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။ (ကာယကံရွင္၏ ဓာတ္ပံုမ်ားအား လံုျခံဳေရးအတြက္ ေဖာ္ျပမထားပါ)
ကာယကံရွင္ ကို– အားလည္း ကၽြႏ္ုပ္တို႔အေနျဖင့္ တိုက္တြန္းလိုတာကေတာ့ တရားဥပေဒကို ေလးစားလိုက္နာေသာအားျဖင့္ အဆိုပါကဲ့သို႔ အင္တာနက္မွ မဟုတ္မမွန္ သတင္းလႊင့္ ျခိမ္းေျခာက္၍ အသက္အႏၲရာယ္ေပးေနသည့္သူမ်ားအား သက္ဆိုင္ရာ တာ၀န္ရွိသူမ်ားႏွင့္ပူးေပါင္းကာ ရွာေဖြေဖာ္ထုတ္၍ လိုအပ္သည့္ တရားဥပေဒလမ္းေၾကာင္းမ်ားျဖင့္ အေရးယူ ေဆာင္ရြက္သြားသင့္ပါေၾကာင္း အၾကံျပဳ တင္ျပ တိုက္တြန္းလိုက္ရပါတယ္။
အလင္းမ်က္၀န္း၏ မိတၳီလာၿမိဳ႕နယ္ စီေဂ်မ်ားႏွင့္ အယ္ဒီတာအဖြဲ႕ ပူးေပါင္းေရးသားသည္။
အလင္းမ်က္၀န္းမီဒီယာသို႔ ဆက္သြယ္ရန္ အီးေမလ္ email@example.com
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 09:38 AM PDT
Mantan anggota Parti Kebebasan, berhaluan kanan dan berfahaman anti-Islam di Belanda, Arnoud van Doorn, telah mengejutkan banyak pihak dengan pengumumannya memeluk Islam baru-baru ini.
Van Doorn yang juga merupakan rakan karib kepada pemimpin parti itu, Geert Wilders, sebelum ini pernah mengakui dia telah keluar daripada parti tersebut pada penghujung 2011.
Menurutnya, dia mahu melakukan perubahan dengan mewarwarkan keputusannya kepada dunia melalui pengucapan kalimah Syahadah yang dimuatnaik di laman Twitter miliknya.
"Tiada tuhan melainkan Allah dan Nabi Muhammad pesuruh Allah," katanya dalam laman sosial tersebut.
Van Doorn juga mengumumkan dalam bahasa Belanda bahawa dia ketika ini 'memulakan kehidupan baharu sebagai seorang Islam.'
Dalam wawancaranya bersama Al-Jazeera.net, van Doorn mengesahkan berita mengenai tindakannya itu.
"Sesiapa yang kenal saya secara dekat boleh membuat terkaan terhadap keputusan saya. Lebih setahun saya menperdalami Islam melalui buku dan ceramah.
"Ramai yang terkejut dengan keputusan ini, terutama mereka yang tahu mengenai pendirian anti-Islam saya," katanya.
Menurutnya, keputusan itu dibuat selepas dia menperdalami Islam tanpa paksaan.
"Kita semua pernah melakukan kesilapan. Namun, saya melihat setiap pengalaman hidup ada sebabnya yang tersendiri dan pengalaman saya sangat berkait rapat dengan keputusan saya lakukan," katanya. - AGENSI
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 05:50 AM PDT
လာမည့္ေမလအတြင္း ဗုဒၶဘာသာ အစြန္းေရာက္ 969 အၾကမ္းဖက္ဂိုဏ္း၏ စိတ္ဓါတ္ေရးရာ ေခါင္းေဆာင္တစ္ဦးျဖစ္ေသာ ဘုန္းၾကီး ၀ီရသူဆိုသူသည္ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားအေပၚ အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈတြင္ နံမည္ၾကီးေသာ သီရိလကၤာႏိုင္ငံသို႔ သြားေရာက္မည္ဟု Dhammavira Ashin FaceBook စာမ်က္ႏွာတြင္ ေဖၚျပခဲ့ပါသည္။
အဆိုပါခရီးစဥ္တြင္ ၀ီရသူအေနျဖင့္ သီရိလကၤာမွ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ အၾကမ္းဖက္အဖြဲ႕အစည္းတစ္ခုျဖစ္ေသာ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ စစ္ေသြးႂကြအဖြဲ႕တစ္ဖဲြ႔ျဖစ္ေသာ Bodu Bala Sena (BBS or Buddhist Force Militia) အဖြဲ႕ႏွင့္ သြားေရာက္ ေတြ႕ဆံုမည္ဟု သိရွိရပါသည္။
အဆိုပါ သီရိလကၤာအၾကမ္းဖက္အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားသည္ သီရိလကၤာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ မြတ္စလင္မ္မ်ားသာမက၊ ခရစ္ယာန္မ်ား၊ တမီးလ္က်ားမ်ားကိုပါ အခြင့္ၾကံဳလ်င္ၾကံဳသလို တုိက္ခိုက္ သတ္ျဖတ္ခဲ့ၾကေသာ အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ား ျဖစ္ပါသည္။
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအတြင္းရွိ ဗုဒၶဘာသာ၀င္မ်ားသည္ ယခင္က အစြန္းမေရာက္သည့္ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းစြာေနထိုင္ခဲ့ၾကသူမ်ား ျဖစ္ခဲ့ၾကေသာ္လည္း အိႏၵိယႏွင့္ သီရိလကၤာႏိုင္ငံမ်ားမွ ကုလားအၾကမ္းဖက္အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားသည္ လြန္ခဲ့ေသာ စစ္အစိုးရေခတ္မွ စတင္၍ စိမ့္၀င္လာခဲ့ၾကၿပီး၊ ၎တိုင္းျပည္မ်ားသို႔လည္း ျမန္မာအစိုးရမွ ပညာေတာ္သင္မ်ား ေရြးခ်ယ္ေစလႊတ္ခဲ့ၿပီးေနာက္ ၎တို႔ ျပန္လည္ေရာက္ရွိလာသည့္အခါ ဘာသာေရးအစြန္းေရာက္စိတ္မ်ား ေပၚေပါက္လာခဲ့ၿပီး အိႏၵိယႏိုင္ငံတြင္ ထုတ္ေ၀ေသာ မြတ္စလင္မ္ဆန္႔က်င္ေရး စာအုပ္မ်ားအား ျမန္မာဘာသာသို႔ ျပန္ဆုိကာ ျမန္မာမႈျပဳ ထုတ္ေ၀ခဲ့ျခင္းမ်ားမွ စတင္ခဲ့ပါသည္။
`အမ်ိဳးေပ်ာက္မွာ စိုးေၾကာက္စရာ´ဟူေသာ စာအုပ္သည္ အိႏၵိယႏိုင္ငံတြင္း အာရိယ ဆမာဂ်္ ႏွင့္ BJP ကဲ့သို႔ေသာ အစြန္းေရာက္ အဖြဲ႕အစည္းမ်ားက ႏုိင္ငံေရး အက်ိဳးအျမတ္အတြက္ ထုတ္ေ၀ခဲ့ေသာ စာအုပ္မ်ားျဖစ္ျပီး အဆိုပါ စာအုပ္မ်ားအား ျမန္မာျပည္ရွိ အဆိုပါ ဂိုဏ္းခြဲမ်ား၏ အကူအညီျဖင့္ ျမန္မာမႈျပဳ ျဖန္႔ေ၀ခဲ့ျခင္း ျဖစ္ပါသည္။
အဆိုပါ ၀ီရသူ၏ ခရီးစဥ္သည္က ဗုဒၶဘာသာ အစြန္းေရာက္၀ါဒသည္ ဒုတိယကမာၻစစ္အျပီး အိႏၵိယမွ စတင္ အေျချပဳခဲ့ေသာ္လည္း ယခုအခါ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံတြင္ အျခားႏုိင္ငံမ်ားထက္ ပိုျပီး အရွိန္အဟုန္ ျမင့္မားလာသည္ဟူေသာ အခ်က္အား ပိုမိုထင္ရွားေစခဲ့ပါသည္။
ကိုးကား >> မင္းႏုိင္ဦး | MMM
အလင္းမ်က္၀န္းမီဒီယာသို႔ ဆက္သြယ္ရန္ အီးေမလ္ firstname.lastname@example.org
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 04:38 AM PDT
I am still very surprised at the turn of events on nomination day. At a time when unity is needed to attain the mission and vision of a better Malaysia, it is certainly very worrying to see the emergence of independent candidates from both sides of the divide. In 2008, there were 115 candidates but this time round, 270 independent candidates filed their papers yesterday. That is an increase of 134%!
To date, these include:
1. Jenice Lee (DAP) incumbent Teratai state assemblyman who was sacked by the DAP disciplinary board for fielding as an independent. She has been given 14 days to make an appeal.
2. MP Sim Tong Him, who is contesting for the parliamentary seat in Kota Melaka under the DAP banner, was sacked for fielding himself as an independent in the Kota Laksamana state seat.
3. Former Agriculture and Agro-based Industries deputy minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shariff Omar has been sacked from UMNO for contesting as an independent in the Tasek Gelugor parliamentary seat in Penang. He is also contesting as a Pakatan-friendly independent in Tasek Gelugor and also the Sungai Dua state seat.
4.Fadzil Hanafi who submitted his nomination papers to stand as an independent candidate for the Alor Mengkudu state seat in Kedah has been sacked by Umno for breaching party discipline.
5. Barisan Nasional candidate for the Pasir Mas parliamentary seat Che Johan Che Pa did not to submit his nomination papers in Kelantan, paving way for a straight fight between Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali and Nik Aziz's son, Nik Abduh Nik Abdul Aziz.
6.Tapah PKR chief Ridzuan Bani has entered the race as an independent candidate. He said his supporters and party members – not him – were unhappy with the leadership's chosen candidate, K. Vasantha Kumar.
7. Umno Wanita deputy chairman Datuk Kamilia Ibrahim also joined the fray as an independent. She has since announced she was resigning from Umno.
8. There will be a six-cornered fight for the Machang Bubuk state seat in Penang between
Please CLICK HERE to read Dr Bridget's analytical piece on the current trends.
Hence, it is clear that the following patterns have emerged:
1. As individuals break out to stand independently, more dirty linen is being washed publicly.
2. The selection process/criteria in certain cases seem suspect.
3. Some leaders are not listening to members and would rather think of the collective good of the party than that of individual members.
4. Pandora's box has been opened as such developments have revealed how in some cases, there is alleged party mismanagement, weak party discipline as evidenced by the reluctance to abide by decisions of the leadership concerned, resentment stemming from unresolved internal party-infighting.
5. For sure, it raises the question of the quality and calibre of party leadership, members and also candidates, not forgetting their perspectives and priorities.
With such an uproar across the board, it is timely that leaders of all parties reveal their selection criteria for citizens to have confidence in the candidates offered. There has to be obedience, discipline, respect and open communication so that conflicts can be resolved privately, not publicly.
Naturally, it is expected that each party would have its own internal rules and procedures.Ideally, candidates are recommended by leaders/members Nomination is the legal process by which election authorities and then the selection committee/board would consider, approve/reject the candidacy application and submit the names/papers on nomination day.
The opportunity to represent a party in an election is not a birthright or membership right but is an honour bestowed by the party's leadership after the relevant procedures have been followed.
Obviously, we cannot have every member standing for election so it is imperative that there are open processes to assess a candidate's experience, character, service record, talent, strengths and weaknesses, suitability, grass root support etc over a period of time to ascertain that only the best are selected.
Of course there is the other consideration of the state and then national levels for both state and parliamentary seats.
To me, the most important aspect for an incumbent would be his/her service/track record that the relevant quarters can use as a base for assessment, not forgetting the candidate's eligibility whereby they must consider's character and to check if there are any questionable issues of ethics, honesty etc.
Through it all, conflict resolution must be undertaken with respect to observe and maintain party unity. There must be ethical rules and regulations put in place and also avenues for open debate with regards to the final selection. Assuming that these are in place in all parties, why did these individuals choose to go solo?
Is this a healthy trend for the nation?
Where does one draw the balance? Promoting the nation, the party or the self?
At the same time, we do see unhealthy patterns and tension surfacing between PKR and PAS allies over a few seats.
1. Sungei Acheh state seat
a. Penang PAS selected its Youth chief Mohd Yusni Mat Piah to stand for the Sungei Acheh seat. PAS claimed it was originally a PAS seat that was "loaned" to PKR in the 2008 polls.
b. PKR is fielding Badrul Hisham Shaharin or Chegu Bard for the Sungai Acheh state seat despite
c. The incumbent assemblyman Datuk Mahmud Zakaria from Barisan.
Why must selfishness rear its ugly head here? Surely the coalition would have discussed seat allocation years ago! Then why this three-way fight when it should ideally be only two?
a. PKR is fielding Tan Sri Ibrahim Menudin
b. PAS candidate is Hadnan Mohamad
c. Umno fresh face candidate here is Rosman Isli.
PAS is fielding three candidates in state seats which were originally meant to be a straight fight between ally PKR and Barisan.
a. Kota Putera
PAS - Adam Mat Said
PKR - Mohamad Abdul Ghani Ibrahim
BN - Mohd Mahdi Musa
b. Bukit Besi
PAS - Roslan Ismail
PKR - Mohd Shamsul Mat Amin
BN -Roslee Daud.
c. Seberang Pakir state seat
PAS - Zakaria Dagang
BN - incumbent Datuk Ahmad Razif Abdul Razak
PKR - Ahmad Nazri Mohd Yusof.
All these seats were previously won by Barisan candidates.
While many activists and politically conscious Malaysians are campaigning rigourously with the slogans, taglines via social media and paraphernalia for a better nation, at the end of the day, which is the most important factor in the equation - the nation (rakyat), the party or the individual? Have they forgotten that it is the rakyat who is the boss?
Is this political maturity and intelligent strategy at its best or political lunacy? Whither Malaysia if budding leaders worship selfishness?
P.S. Please accept my deepest apologies for any error in this post. I found a website that has over 2 million ebooks and have been reading endlessly through the day and night in a bid to read as much as I can before I 'depart'. As such, my vision is quite blur now.
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 04:36 AM PDT
Davis Cup ၿပိဳင္ပြဲက်င္းပမည့္ အႀကိဳသတင္းစာ ရွင္းလင္းပြဲတြင္ ေတြ႕ရေသာ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ တင္းနစ္ အဖြဲ႕ခ်ဳပ္ တာဝန္ရွိသူမ်ား
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံမွ အိမ္ရွင္အျဖစ္ လက္ခံက်င္းပမည့္ Davis Cup Asia Oceania Zone Group(IV) 2013 တင္းနစ္ၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို လံုၿခံဳေရး အေျခအေနေၾကာင့္ ၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို ေရႊ႔ဆိုင္းခဲ့ရေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။
ၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို ဧၿပီလ (၂၂) ရက္မွ (၂၈) ရက္အထိ ရန္ကုန္ၿမိဳ႔ရွိ သိမ္ျဖဴတင္းနစ္ကြင္းတြင္ က်င္းပရန္ စီစဥ္ထားခဲ့ၿပီး အိမ္ရွင္ျမန္မာအသင္း အပါအ၀င္ ဘာရိန္း၊ ကာဇက္စတန္၊ အီရတ္၊ ကာဂ်စၥတန္၊ ကာတာ၊ ေဆာ္ဒီ၊ တာမင္နစၥတန္၊ ေဂ်ာ္ဒန္၊ စင္ကာပူႏွင့္ ဘဂၤလားေဒ့ရွ္အသင္းတို႔ ပါ၀င္ယွဥ္ၿပိဳင္ရန္ စာရင္းေပးသြင္း ထားခဲ့သည္။
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ တင္းနစ္အဖြဲ႔ခ်ဳပ္ အေထြေထြအတြင္းေရးမွဴး ဦးေလးႏိုင္က "အခုၿပိဳင္ပြဲမွာ ၿပိဳင္ပြဲ၀င္အသင္း အမ်ားစုက အေရွ႕အလယ္ပိုင္းက အသင္းေတြ ပါ၀င္တာေၾကာင့္ ဒီၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို ေရႊ႕ဆိုင္းဖို႔ တာ၀န္ရွိသူေတြက ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို ေရႊ႔ဆိုင္းဖို႔ကိုလည္း ႏုိင္ငံတကာ တင္းနစ္အဖြဲ႔ခ်ဳပ္ (ITF) ကိုလည္း အေၾကာင္းၾကားခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ၿပိဳင္ပြဲေရႊ႕ဆိုင္းဖို႔ကို ITF က လက္ခံေပမယ့္ လံုၿခံဳေရးစိတ္ခ်ရမယ့္ အခ်ိန္မွာ အိမ္ရွင္အျဖစ္ ျပန္လည္က်င္းပခြင့္ ရရွိဖို႔ကေတာ့ မေသခ်ာေတာ့ပါဘူး။ အိမ္ရွင္အျဖစ္ လက္ခံက်င္းပမယ့္ ႏုိင္ငံကို ITF ကပဲ ထပ္မံေရြးခ်ယ္သြားမွာပါ" ဟု ေျပာၾကားခဲ့သည္။
ယင္းၿပိဳင္ပြဲကို ၿပီးခဲ့သည့္ဧၿပီလ (၁၃) ရက္ေန႔က ေရႊ႔ဆိုင္းရန္ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့ျခင္းေၾကာင့္ ပါ၀င္ယွဥ္ၿပိဳင္မည့္ အသင္းမ်ား အေနျဖင့္ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသို႔ လာေရာက္ခဲ့ျခင္း မရွိေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။ ထို႔အျပင္ ဧၿပီလ(၂၉)ရက္မွ ေမလ(၅)ရက္ေန႔အထိ အိမ္ရွင္အျဖစ္ လက္ခံက်င္းပမည့္ Davis Cup ၿပိဳင္ပြဲ Group(III) ကိုလည္း အလားတူ ေရႊ႔ဆိုင္းခဲ့ေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 04:09 AM PDT
JEDDAH – Appealing for UN intervention to stop attacks on Muslims in Burma, a world Muslim body has urged the Burmese government to allow in a ministerial delegation to discuss anti-Muslim violence in the Buddhist country.
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation calls on "Burmese authorities to strongly respond to the organization's appeal and allow a ministerial OIC delegation to visit" Burma, the OIC said in a statement cited by Agence France-Presse (AFP).
More than 43 people were killed and several mosques burnt in a week of sectarian violence in the central city of Meiktila earlier this month.
The anti-Muslim violence started by an argument between a Buddhist couple and gold shop owners and later spread to several towns in central Burma.
Monks were blamed for inciting hatred against Muslims by preaching a so-called "969 movement" which represents a radical form of anti-Islamic nationalism that urges Buddhists to boycott Muslim-run shops and services.
The violence followed attacks on Bengali-ethnic Muslims, known as Rohingya, in a deadly bout of sectarian clashes in western Burma.
"Such violence is a clear indication of the government's negative approach in dealing with ethnic and religious tensions that erupted last summer," OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said in his speech at an emergency meeting of the OIC Contact Group on Sunday, April 14.
The OIC chief criticized the refusal of the Burmese government to allow an OIC delegation to visit Burma to check on reports of anti-Muslim violence.
"Despite our attempts to establish communication with the authorities in Myanmar (Burma) by selecting a prominent figure from a neighboring country to visit Myanmar and open discussions with officials, the government was not responsive."
Formed in September, the Contact Group includes 11 of the OIC's 57 members — Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Brunei, Djibouti, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Malaysia, Sudan and Turkey.
In October, the OIC tried to open an office in Burma to help Muslims there, but the move was blocked by President Thein Sein following massive protests by Buddhist monks.
The world Muslim body has also appealed to the United Nations to intervene to stop attacks against Muslims in Burma.
"Security Council must protect rights and lives of Rohingya Muslims," Ihsanoglu told the meeting.
He told Saudi Gazette that the OIC will ask the UN Human Rights Council to send fact-finding mission to investigate all human rights violations in Burma.
Wakar Uddin, Director-General of Arakan Rohingya Union (ARU), called for Muslim support to stop attacks against Burmese Muslims.
"This is no longer a Rohingya issue," Uddin said.
"It's becoming an Islamic issue because the radical elements in Myanmar are trying to eliminate Islam from the country."
Burma's Muslims — largely of Indian, Chinese and Bangladeshi descent — account for an estimated four percent of the roughly 60 million population.
Muslims entered Burma en masse for the first time as indentured laborers from the Indian subcontinent during British colonial rule, which ended in 1948.
But despite their long history, they have never fully been integrated into the country.
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 05:20 AM PDT
Kedua-dua orang calon bagi N27 Merlimau hari ini secara kebetulan tersemperak di Pasar Tani Merlimau.
Kedua-dua calon berkenaan, Hj Yuhaizad Abdullah (PAS) dan Roslan Ahmad (BN) bertembung di kawasan pasar tani di Bandar Baru Merlimau apabila masing-masing menjalankan program kempen untuk merapatkan diri dan bermesra dengan masyarakat setempat yang hadir di pasar berkenaan pagi tadi.
Sebenarnya ini adalah kali kedua Hj Yuhaizad dan Roslan bertemu di dalam pilihanraya. Kali pertama ialah semasa pilihanraya kecil pada 6 Mac 2011 ekoran kematian wakil rakyatnya, Datuk Mohamad Hidhir Abu Hasan dari UMNO.
BN berjaya mengalahkan PAS di dalam PRK tersebut.
Semasa PRK tersebut berlaku juga beberapa "pertembungan" seperti gambar yang dirakam di atas. Namun yang paling diingati ialah apabila kedua-dua calon menghadiri majlis kematian dan memikul keranda jenazah Allahyarham Ali Basha secara bersama-sama.
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 01:57 AM PDT
Buddhist monks protest OIC in Mandalay on Monday. (PHOTO: Man Thar Lay / Irrawaddy)
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has blasted the Burmese government for reneging on its commitment to allow the group to open an office in Burma, saying that it is not serious about humanitarian issues.
Speaking to The Irrawaddy on Tuesday from the OIC headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, the director of the Muslim Minorities and Communities Department, Talal Daous, said, "It is an unfortunate thing to happen, because this office is only for humanitarian purposes.
"We have already signed an agreement, but it seems the government of Myanmar [Burma] is not serious about humanitarian issues," he said.
Naypyidaw's move to backtrack on its agreement with the Islamic bloc came after Buddhist monks led demonstrations in several cities across the country to protest the decision to allow the OIC to open an office.
The President's Office in Naypyidaw issued a statement on its website on Tuesday saying that it is the wishes of the people that the OIC not be given the right to set up an office in Burma.
However, Talal Daous said that the OIC had not received any official statement from the Burmese government and is still waiting for an answer.
The OIC signed an MoU with the Burmese government on Aug. 11 to open offices for humanitarian purposes in Rangoon and Sittwe. A delegation from the OIC then traveled to Arakan State in September to inspect the aftermath of communal clashes between Muslims and Buddhists in the strife-torn region.
The OIC said that it intends to distribute humanitarian aid to victims from both the Arakanese Buddhist and Muslim Rohingya communities without discrimination.
"We are also urging the international community to help the victims," said Talal Daous. "From a humanitarian point of view, we are seeking to help all people who were effected by violence."
He said that the victims continue to suffer.
Hla Thein, a Muslim community leader in Rangoon, said, "The current announcement by the President's office not to allow the OIC to base [in Burma] is favorable only to the Rakhine people.
"No one will trust this government," he said. "The Myitsone dam was a similar case when they signed an agreement, but then withdrew it again. In fact, they should not sign an agreement in the first place if they're going to act like that."
Chris Lewa, an NGO coordinator working with the Rohingya in western Arakan State, said, "I can understand why people feel threatened by an OIC presence in Sittwe, although I don't see why the OIC should not have a diplomatic presence in Yangon [Rangoon] as other regional bodies do.
"The Burmese government has now changed its mind as it already has too many conflicts on its hands and does not want to antagonize people, especially monks with a strong moral authority, and it wants to avoid at all costs any further unrest [which] could be exploited and spread beyond Arakan."
Lewa, who visited Sittwe as a consultant for Refugees International in September, said, "A lot of humanitarian funding has already been pledged but so far little has actually materialized through the UN and the Myanmar Red Cross Society. The serious dilemma is the issue of segregation. That is why aid has focused on emergency assistance for the displaced—building shelters, food relief and drinking water. But there is an urgent need to also provide better sanitation, health services and education."
Hla Thein said that Rohingya refugees who do not have enough food will face starvation.
According to Lewa: "The segregation policy in Sittwe is shocking and unacceptable and it will only increase tensions. The government should take drastic action to stop and prosecute extremist Rakhine elements harassing the Muslim population and actively work for a solution and to restore peace and the rule of law.
"Humanitarian assistance alone is not a solution," she said. "Development assistance should help both communities in the long term once life in Arakan State returns to normalcy. If people in Burma feel that the OIC presence is an interference in the internal affairs of the country, they and the monks should immediately and urgently take responsibility to resolve the conflict peacefully."
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 01:38 AM PDT
1970 luyechun Dr. Than Win (1stMB jr)- 2nd from right with bag slung across (TQ for the picture.
1970 luyechun Ko Ko Gyi (me) (1st. MB Sr)- at the back on the right side of Dr Than Win
Win Oo at the Education Minister's dinner with 1970 Luyechuns
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 01:06 AM PDT
"သံသရာမွာ ေဆြမ်ိဳးမေတာ္ဖူးတဲ့သူရယ္လို႕ တစ္ေယာက္မွ မရွိတဲ့အတြက္ အခု ဒုကၡေရာက္ေနၾကတဲ့ အစၥလာမ္ဘာသာဝင္မ်ားဟာလည္း ဦးဇင္းရဲ႕ မိဘ၊ ညီအကုိ ေမာင္နွမ၊ ေဆြမ်ိဳးေတြခ်ည္းပါဘဲ။ ကုိယ့္ေဆြမ်ိဳးေတြ ဒုကၡေရာက္ေနတာကုိ လံုးဝမၾကည့္ရက္လို႕ အခုလို လာအားေပးတာပါ။
ဘာပဲျဖစ္ျဖစ္ ဗုဒၶဘာသာဝင္အားလံုးရဲ႕ ကုိယ္စားခြင့္လႊတ္ပါ လို႕ ဦးဇင္းကပဲေတာင္းပန္ပါတယ္။…
ေမတၱာစစ္ ေမတၱာမွန္ဆိုတာ နယ္စည္းမျခားတဲ့ေမတၱာပါ။ ဘာသာဆိုတဲ့ နယ္စည္းလည္းမျခားရပါဘူး၊ လူမ်ိဳးဆိုတဲ့ နယ္စည္းလည္းမျခားရပါဘူး။…………….."
ဦးဇင္းလွဴတဲ့ ရုပ္ဝတၳဳ ပစၥည္းဟာဘာမွ မေျပာပေလာက္ေပမယ့္ ဦးဇင္းရင္ထဲက ေမတၱာေတြကေတာ့ အတုိင္းအဆ မရွိပါဘူး။ စျဖစ္ကတည္းက လည္း အခုထိ ေမတၱာပို႕ေပးေနပါတယ္။ ခရီးစဥ္တေလွ်ာက္မွာလည္း စကၠန္႕မလပ္ ေမတၱာပို႕ေပးေနပါတယ္။
ဘာပဲျဖစ္ျဖစ္ ဗုဒၶဘာသာဝင္အားလံုးရဲ႕ ကုိယ္စားခြင့္လႊတ္ပါ လို႕ ဦးဇင္းကပဲေတာင္းပန္ပါတယ္။…
ေမတၱာစစ္ ေမတၱာမွန္ဆိုတာ နယ္စည္းမျခားတဲ့ေမတၱာပါ။ ဘာသာဆိုတဲ့ နယ္စည္းလည္းမျခားရပါဘူး၊ လူမ်ိဳးဆိုတဲ့ နယ္စည္းလည္းမျခားရပါဘူး။…………….."
(ေရႊပါရမီေတာရ ဆရာေတာ္ဆႏၵာဓိက) ဧၿပီ ၁ရက္။
FB of Win Min Thein
Posted: 20 Apr 2013 11:57 PM PDT
An UMNO member and as promised, my votes are for BN in Pekan Parliament and Dun..even though reluctantly..
It's getting to be rather sickening.
First I heard that in Raub yesterday MCA minders who were not supposed to be in the nomination hall were there to probably heave Dato' Seri Ho Khai Mun on their shoulders because they were so pompously sure they would win by default.
It's so pathetic when we cannot wait to see the downfall of a Malay politician whose political career was short circuited so quickly by our 'virtuous' khalifah, who is not only super powerful because he hails from a highly aristrocratic family but his wealth is way beyond imagination.
Why should anybody want to eagerly bring down a lame 'dog' who is barking at the 'mountain'?
Also, come on..when Dato' Ariff was in BN, they did solat hajat in full public view too before entering the dewan penamaan calon..nobody complained!
So stop that bloody crap of jeering at them!
I thank the 2 Malay BN Raub incumbents for still wanting to be friendly with Dato' Ariff even though he is now a DAP-ian..can't we say that instead of calling DAP-igs?
The Chinese generally love to eat pork..that is their cultural diet..
Calling others pigs especially to a Muslim is meant to degrade a person to the lowest level!
This morning, my cleaner came and told me she is so angry because if DSAI become the PM, we will be in control by the Chinese.
She said she read it in the phamplets distributed out to them last night!
What the hell!
Why on earth does UMNO want to make these simple kampong folks think like fools.
She is actually quite an intelligent lady even though she was too poor to finish schooling.
Please laah..do not insult the intelligence of these kampung people..they are not dumb you know.
I blew fire in trying to wake her senses back.
Of course we want BN to win.
However as it is now, even though our PM is Malay, the billionaires and multi millionaires in Malaysia are basically from the Chinese community.
They can buy the whole of Malaysia with just a snap of the finger.
And who helped make them ultra rich and extremely powerful?
Our BN leaders!
We do not need to wait for Anwar Ibrahim to become the PM!
Our economic power IS controlled by the Chinese!
And thus indirectly the political power too.
Somebody told me that day Dato' Ti Liang Ker wife's family is so very rich that a large portion of Pahang land are theirs.
They are among the wealthiest family in the state.
I know they are filthy rich but wow..
Dato' Ti better correct that glam rumour if it is an exaggerated notion.
Again..A Chinese too.
We hear of so many Chinese businessmen fronting for our super wealthy Malay politicians..maybe it could be that our Malay businessmen are just not business savvy enough??
So why wait for PR to put Anwar Ibrahim as PM and throw the garbage idea that the Chinese will be in control?
I want to also ask?
Why is BN so afraid to give more TV coverage to PR leaders to have their say?
I read in Fb today that Dato' Harun Din lamented last night DSN was on TV for
Why is BN behaving like this?
Let them have ample time like BN on TV.
Are we afraid we will lose the PRU 13 if we allow them to have more TV cameo appearances?
BN will most likely stay in power but hopefully, many more PR candidates will win very well too..
And I pray Dato' Ariff Sabri Bin Haji Abdul Aziz from DAP will be one of our incoming parliamentarians who will make BN leaders jot down feverishly, and squirm when he makes his Dewan presentations..
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 12:29 AM PDT
VOA Talk Show မွာ လူမ်ဳိးေရးဘာသာေရး အၾကမ္းဖက္မႈဟာ ျမန္မာ့ျပဳျပင္ေျပာင္းလဲေရး ဘယ္ေလာက္ထိခိုက္လဲဆိုတဲ့အေၾကာင္း ေဆြးေႏြးခဲ့တယ္။
အဲဒီမွာ ေရွ႕ေန ဦးကိုနီေထာက္ျပတဲ့အခ်က္က …
[ေနာက္တစ္ခုက ေဘာ္စတြန္က ဗံုးခြဲသူလို႔သံသယရွိတဲ့သူေတြကို ရဲေတြက ပိုက္စိတ္တိုက္ရွာတဲ့အခါမွာ လူ႕အခြင့္အေရးထက္ အမ်ဳိးသားလံုၿခံဳေရးက အေရးႀကီးတယ္ဆိုၿပီး ေျပာတာေတြ ေတြ႕ရတယ္။ ဥပေဒခ်ဳိးေဖာက္မွေတာ့ ဥပေဒအတိုင္း အေရးယူရတာပဲ။ ဖမ္းဆီးဖို႔ဆိုတာလည္း တရားရံုးေတြက ဝရန္းေတြထုတ္၊ အဆင့္ဆင့္ နည္းလမ္းေတြသံုးၿပီးမွ ဖိုက္တင္းလုပ္ၾကတာ။]
လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးက အေရးမႀကီးဘူး မိဖို႔ဆိုတာ လမ္းေၾကာင္းလြဲေအာင္ ေျပာေနတာပဲ။
ျမန္မာျပည္မွာ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကို နားခါးေနတဲ့ လူတန္းစားတစ္ရပ္ကို ထပ္ၿပီး သတိေပးခ်င္ပါတယ္။
လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးကို ခ်ဳိးေဖာက္ဖို႔မ်ား စဥ္းစားေနရင္ တိုင္းျပည္ပါပ်က္သြားႏိုင္တယ္ဆိုတာ နားလည္ေစခ်င္တယ္။
ျပည္သူေတြရုန္းကန္ခဲ့တာ ဒီမိုကေရစီနဲ႔ လူ႕အခြင့္အေရးအတြက္ပါ။
ေျပာခ်င္ရာေျပာ လူသတ္ခ်င္ရာသတ္လို႔ရၿပီ၊ အားရပါးရ မုန္းလို႔ရၿပီလို႔ထင္ေနရင္ လုပ္ၾကည့္လိုက္ပါ။
အမ်ဳိးသားေရး အမ်ဳိးသားေရးဆိုတဲ့အသံၾကားရင္ စစ္ေထာက္လွမ္းေရးေတြ အပင္းသြင္းခဲ့တဲ့ အဆိပ္ေတြကို ျမင္ေယာင္မိတယ္။ အမ်ဳိးသားေရးသိပ္တက္ၾကြေနသူေတြ အမ်ဳိးသားႏိုင္ငံေရးဆိုတာကို သိတယ္ေနာ္။ ဘာၿပီးရင္ ဘာလာမလဲ သိရင္ ၿပီးတာပဲ။
အခုေတာ့ ရဝမ္ဒါလူသတ္ပြဲနဲ႔ ယူဂိုဆလားဗီးယား လူသတ္ပြဲ မွတ္တမ္းေတြ ျပန္ၾကည့္ေနတယ္။
မက္ရွက္တီးလိုေခၚတဲ့ ဓါးရွည္ေတြတဝင့္ဝင့္နဲ႔ တိရိစာၦန္စိတ္ဝင္ေနတဲ့ လူအုပ္ေတြရဲ႕ တိုက္ခိုက္မႈေတြေအာက္က အျပစ္မဲ့လူေတြ အတံုးအရံုးေသေၾကၾကတယ္။
တိရိစာၦန္စိတ္ဝင္တဲ့သူဆီမွာ လူမ်ဳိးလည္းမရွိဘူး။ ဘာသာလည္း မရွိဘူး။ လူသားခ်င္းစာနာစိတ္က ပိုဆိုးတာေပါ့။ လူမွ မဟုတ္ေတာ့ဘဲ။
Posted: 20 Apr 2013 11:59 PM PDT
THE National University of Singapore's (NUS) Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine said that it is investigating tweets containing confidential patient information which caused an uproar after a screenshot was posted online.
The two tweets, posted on April 7 from a final year medical student's Twitter account, had information about a patient's pregnancy and abortion history, including a line "Don't even wna look at this patient".
These students at the medical school are currently doing their electives, where they are attached to hospitals to shadow senior doctors and may come into contact with patients.
"If the student who allegedly tweeted about patient information is indeed from the NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, he/she will be counselled and will also be subjected to disciplinary proceedings," the school said in a statement.
The Straits Times understands that the school is investigating other possibilities, such as whether the Twitter account had been hacked.
A check found the account has been deleted.
The school said the importance of safeguarding patient confidentiality is constantly emphasised throughout clinical training.
Students have to sign confidentiality agreements before embarking on clinical training in the hospitals.
It added: "Students at the NUS medical school have always been taught to safeguard their patient's records and confidences. They have been taught that confidentiality is central to the trust patients place with them and it is an important ethical and legal principle."
The post on Stomp attracted over 6,800 views with some commentators questioning the student's professionalism while others excused it, saying the patient was not named in the tweets.
A student at the medical school, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he was shocked.
"Right from the start, the school stressed the importance of patient confidentiality," he said.
"In Year 1, there's a module called Health Ethics, Law and Professionalism where we were regularly reminded that we cannot talk about the patient's condition at all, even if we don't mention a name or age." — The Straits Times/ Asia News Network
Posted: 21 Apr 2013 02:23 AM PDT
Tindakan Timbalan Pengerusi BN, Tan Sri Muhyidin Yassin mengumumkan kemenangan tanpa bertanding calon BN di DUN Senggarang semalam dikesali.
Ini kerana dakwaan orang nombor dua Barisan Nasional (BN) itu terbukti bohong.
Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) mengumumkan calon PAS, Dr Ramli Kari akan bertanding di situ melawan calon BN.
Kira-kira jam 1.20 semalam, TV3 mengumumkan kemenangan tanpa bertanding calon BN di Senggarang, Johor.
Sehingga berita ini ditulis, laporan berita itu masih disiarkan dalam laman web TV3.
"Barisan Nasional mencatat permulaan yang baik bagi menghadapi kempen Pilihan Raya Umum ke-13 apabila menang tanpa bertanding bagi kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri Senggarang, Johor.
"Calon BN bagi kerusi berkenaan Abd Aziz Ismail disahkan menang tanpa bertanding selepas borang pencalonan seorang lagi calon ditolak pegawai pengurus pilihan raya kawasan berkenaan," lapor TV3.
Berita itu memetik kata-kata Muhyidin yang memperlekeh calon PAS kononnya tidak pandai mengisi borang pencalonan.
Terbukti berita itu palsu apabila SPR mengesahkan penyertaan calon PAS Dr Ramli Kari di situ.
"PAS bertanding di DUN Senggarang. Segala berita mengatakan BN menang tanpa bertanding di Senggarang adalah palsu," tulis laman Facebook PAS Kawasan Batu Pahat. -HD
Banyak kali dah GB bagitahu, inilah TPM paling bangang yang Malaysia pernah ada.
Sentiasa mempercayai bulat-bulat pemberi maklumat kepadanya dan kemudian menyerang dan merendah-rendahkan pihak lain tak tentu pasal dan tak tentu hala. Kembang hidungnya tatkala memperlekeh calon PAS kononnya tidak pandai mengisi borang pencalonan.
IQnya rendah, rasismanya tebal dan hanya tahu nak memperbodohkan rakyat.
Sekarang tertepek ke muka sendiri!
klik untuk baca
Posted: 19 Apr 2013 11:13 PM PDT
I was supposed to go support a friend at a Nomination Day function somewhere on the island today but somehow, my plans changed almost at the last minute. With time a little free on my hands, I then decided to throw in my support for the Pakatan Rakyat parliamentary and state candidates in Bukit Mertajam.
So at nine o'clock in the morning, I found myself walking to the Jalan Song Ban Kheng-Jalan Betik road junction. The side of the main road was already filled with cars and supporters. Found a vacant spot and managed to squeeze my car into it.
From left to right: cousin, acquaintance, old schoolmate, former work colleague, myself
Possibly about 200 people - a mix of Chinese, Malays and Indians - were already there at the junction, mostly garbed in yellow T-shirts while I sported the Ubah T-shirt that I had bought days earlier from the DAP Penang headquarters about a week back. The flags of the DAP, PKR and PAS were flying everywhere, and the people were clearly enjoying themselves. Party mood.
Shortly after nine o'clock, the Pakatan Rakyat candidates entered the roadblock which the Police had set up. Only the candidates and their seconders were allowed through and they walked a short distance to the Public Works Department Office.
However, I found it disconcerting that barbed wire had also been stretched across the road block. Was it really necessary when everyone were in carnival mood?
From my vantage point, I could see a similar roadblock set up about a hundred metres away to block off the Barisan Nasional supporters. Very difficult to estimate how many of their supporters were there but it didn't really mattered.
About 10 minutes later, we noticed that from the other end of the road, the candidates from the Barisan Nasional had also arrived at the nomination centre.
I didn't wait for 10 o'clock. That was the time when nominations would end. I didn't wait because, well, the little time on my hands had ended and there were other things to do. So I took leave of this group of people, glad that I had at least now experienced the atmosphere during nomination day.
Posted: 20 Apr 2013 10:37 PM PDT
Where or how to get tax rebates COMPILED BY LISA GOH
Claimable expenses: According to KPMG Tax Services executive director Datin Pauline Tam, there are a lot of deductions that taxpayers can claim for within the legal framework, if they have the appropriate supporting documents.
There's still the taxes to file even if you are caught up in the fever of the 13th General Election.
WHEN filing your taxes, it helps to know which incomes are taxable and where or how you can get rebates. So, from rental income to stock gains, KPMG Tax Services executive director Datin Pauline Tam tackles some of the queries raised by Sunday Star readers.
> I have four children. Three registered under my wife and one registered under my name for the National Education Savings Scheme (SSPN). How is the tax rebate claimed in such a situation?
Your wife is entitled to claim the net deposits (but limited to a maximum of RM6,000) in the three accounts registered under her own name. Likewise, you are entitled to claim the same for the accounts registered under your name. The claim is only allowed for Years of Assessment 2012 to 2017.
> If I invest RM3,000 on the Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) this year, can I claim the rebate, then sell it early next year and reinvest? Can the reinvestment be claimable again against RM3,000? Can this approach also apply to the SSPN scheme?
An individual can claim an aggregate amount of payment of deferred annuity or contribution to the PRS or both up to maximum of RM3,000 for a year. In this respect, technically, you could claim contributions to PRS (assuming that you are not claiming for payment of deferred annuity) based on your aggregate amount of contributions to the PRS as evidenced by the relevant statement issued by the PRS.
However, effective from Jan 1 this year, the withdrawal of contributions from a PRS by an individual before he reaches the age of 55 would be subject to a withholding tax at the rate of 8%. In addition, contributions to a PRS may involve some terms and conditions which may not offer you the flexibility to switch over to another PRS in the subsequent year. The claim for deduction for contributions to PRS is from Years of Assessment 2012 to 2021.
With regard to the deduction for deposits in the SSPN account, the allowable deduction is limited to the net deposit (after taking into account the withdrawals during the same year) and up to a maximum of RM6,000. Further, we understand that there could be some restriction on the quantum that you could withdraw from the SSPN account. The claim for deduction for net deposit into the SSPN account is from Years of Assessment 2012 to 2017.
> Can the pap smear test be classified under medical fees?
You can claim an amount of up to RM500 in respect of a complete medical examination expenses expended on yourself or your spouse or your children as evidenced by receipts issued by a licensed hospital or licensed medical practitioner. Thus, you can make a claim if a pap smear test is part of the complete medical examination. However, if the medical fee is just for pap smear test, it would not be claimable.
> a) For parents' medical expenses, can I claim for chemotherapy treatment of my mother's cancer?
The tax relief under "medical treatment, special needs and carer expenses for parents" which is limited to RM5,000 includes chemotherapy treatment for parents.
b) Must the medical expenses be incurred at, or paid to, a government hospital or clinic? Can treatment at a private hospital or traditional Chinese treatment/medical hall qualify for deduction?
The claim must be evidenced by a receipt issued by a registered medical practitioner certifying that the medical treatment has been provided to the parents. In the case where the receipt is issued in the name of the patient, the tax payer must obtain an endorsement on the receipt by the doctor to certify the medical charges were paid by him. As an alternative, if the charges were paid via his credit card, the credit card receipt (as well as a clear photocopy in case the original receipt fades over time) and the hospital bills should be kept as evidence of payment.
Rent collection: Property owners only need to declare rental income when their properties are rented out.
> On deductions for parents' medical expenses, can I claim for my in-laws?
The current tax laws only allow claim of specified medical expenses on one's own parents and not parents-in-law.
> I have a question on the RM10,000 deduction for interest on housing loan (which has a three-year expiring period commencing from the date in which the interest is first expended). I bought my house in 2009 under a developer interest bearing scheme (DIBS) and took delivery of the house in mid-2011. I made my first (interest deduction) claim in assessment year 2011 and am making the second claim for assessment year 2012. Is this claim my last?
We note from Section 46B(2) of the Income Tax Act 1967 (" the Tax Act") in relation to the deduction of interest on housing loan, that the wordings used are "…a period of three consecutive basis years beginning from the basis year in which the interest referred to …is first expended by that individual". Applying the above in your circumstances, if the first year you expended interest is 2011, then you are eligible for the claim of interest for 2011, 2012 and 2013.
> Does the RM500 broadband deduction cover fixed broadband and mobile Internet?
Based on the Inland Revenue Board guidelines issued on April 12, 2011, the relief can be given for fees paid for Internet connection via cable or Digital Subscriber Line with the speed of 256kbps or more but not for fees paid for dial-up service (56kbps) for Internet connection. The fees must be paid by the individual for broadband subscription that is registered under his own personal name. The deduction is only allowed for Years of Assessment 2010, 2011 and 2012.
You are required to submit a tax return by the due date even if you do not have any chargeable income under the following circumstances – you have chargeable income in the immediate preceding year; or you have submitted a tax return in the immediate preceding year; or you are required to submit a tax return (but failed to submit) for the immediate preceding year. However, you do not need to submit a tax return if you are able to obtain a waiver from the IRB.
> As my EPF has exceeded the maximum of RM6,000, I claim 60% on my insurance under medical. However, I only did this last year. Can I make a claim for all the previous years that I did not submit this 60%?
You could claim a relief not exceeding RM3,000 on insurance premiums in respect of medical or education benefits for yourself or your spouse or your child. If you have omitted to claim for the past years, you could make an appointment to meet with an IRB official at the IRB's branch where your tax file is maintained and submit an official letter with the original supporting documents to make the claims for the past six years.
> I bought an iPad in 2011 and during the year, I was not entitled to tax deduction as I had already claimed for a computer bought in 2008. Can I claim tax deduction on the iPad in year 2012?
The claim for the purchase of a personal computer is allowed once in three years. As you have made your last claim in 2008, you could make the next claim in 2011. Personal computer means a desktop computer, laptop computer and handheld computer and does not include computer accessories. We understand that with recent innovations in IT, the definition has expanded to include mobile computers like tablet PC, as long as the gadget does not include the features of a mobile phone.
With regard to whether the claim of iPad as purchase of a personal computer is allowed, it is still not clear. Since you made the purchase in 2011 and you should have submitted your 2011 tax return, you may wish to check with the IRB's branch where your tax file is maintained whether you could make a revised claim against your 2011 income in respect of the purchase of iPad in 2011.
> I retired in Malaysia in August 2011, and was subsequently offered a one-year contract till August 2012 in Cambodia. During the tenure of my contract, I paid income tax to the Cambodian government (there is no double taxation agreement between Cambodia and Malaysia), and none to the Malaysian Government.
Since I did not have any employment income in Malaysia for assessment year 2012, I should be submitting a NIL return for my tax filing. However, since I have received Malaysian corporate tax-deducted shares dividends in 2012, I will be filing my tax return for the shares dividends income. Need advice/clarification on the following:
a) In 2012, I continued to contribute to EPF in Malaysia via my employer in Malaysia. Can I claim the EPF contributions as rebate/deduction in my tax filing? I have the EPF statement as proof of the contribution.
You are eligible to claim your EPF contributions as a personal deduction under "Life insurance and provident fund" in your tax return if you qualify as a tax resident in 2012. The claim for EPF contributions and life insurance premiums is limited to RM6,000. If you have taken a loan to finance your investment in shares, the interest expenses incurred by you would be deductible against the dividend income.
b) In the income tax form, there is a column/category: "Interest on loan employed in the production of gross dividend income" eligible to be deducted from total dividend received. How can I enjoy this deduction? What type of bank documents are required as proof of the loan employed, if any?
Documented evidence such as the offer letter from the bank and the bank statements indicating the flow of funds for financing the share investments would be required to prove that the funds have been utilised to finance the acquisition of the share investments.
All taxpayers are subject to tax audits. Therefore, the supporting documents to substantiate the utilisation of funds for the purchase of the share investments and interest expenses incurred by you are required to be kept for seven years from the end of the year in which you have made a claim for the interest expenses.
> My husband has already submitted his tax assessment. Later, we noticed that he did not fill a column for rebate on disabled spouse, which is RM3,500. I submit my tax separately from him. Is he entitled for the rebate if we write to IRB?
It appears that you have elected for separate assessment. In this respect, your husband is not entitled to claim a deduction for a disabled spouse.
> My spouse has quit her job to become a full-time housewife with no income. a) Am I better off filing under joint or separate assessment?
Based on your circumstances, the type of assessment (indicated in the tax return) that is applicable on you is under category 4 (if the individual is married with a spouse who has no income/no source of income or has income which is tax exempt).
b) Does she have to fill in too (assuming if I'm better off in separate assessment)?
Your wife is required to submit a tax return by the due date even if she does not have any chargeable income under the following circumstances – she has chargeable income in the immediate preceding year; or she has submitted a tax return in the immediate preceding year; or she is required to submit a tax return (but failed to submit) for the immediate preceding year.
However, she does not need to submit a tax return if she is able to obtain a waiver from the IRB. The type of assessment that she should indicate in her tax return is category 1 (joint in the name of husband) to allow you to claim the personal relief for spouse and children.
> I am a pensioner. I opted for early retirement at the age of 40 and I turned 55 last year. Do I have to declare the full year's pension for last year or until April (my birth month)?
Pensions that you received up to the date before you turned 55 are taxable and only that portion is required to be declared.
> I am a pharmacist. In 2012, I took a professional exam. There were no classes involved. I bought the e-book for US$300 (RM906) online, which I will claim under Books. I also paid US$700 (RM2,115) exam fees. Is this fee tax deductible? Do I claim it under education?
According to Section 46(1)(f) of the Tax Act, a maximum of RM5,000 is deductible in respect of fees expended by the taxpayer on himself in any institution or professional body in Malaysia recognised by the Government or approved by the Finance Minister, as the case may be, for the following:
(i) on any course of study up to tertiary level, other than a degree at Masters or Doctorate level, undertaken for the purpose of acquiring law, accounting, Islamic financing, technical, vocational, industrial, scientific or technological skills or qualifications; or
(ii) any course of study for a degree at Masters or Doctorate level undertaken for the purpose of acquiring any skill or qualification.
Please check whether your course of study falls within the above to determine your fees are deductible under "Education Fees".
> Do I need to declare profit from buying and selling shares as an income?
Whether the profit from buying and selling of shares is regarded as a taxable income would depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. If the transaction can be demonstrated as a realisation of a capital investment, it can then be regarded as a capital gain not subject to income tax. On the other hand, if the transaction is derived from an adventure in the nature of a trade, then the profit from buying and selling of shares would then be seen as a revenue gain subject to income tax.
> I have a few properties, one of which is occupied by my son. Do I have to declare that as rental income? If there is another house left empty, do I have to declare that as well?
You only declare when you start to let out your properties.
> I receive a rental income from my new apartment. What are the deductions I can claim and are there limits?
Expenses which are allowed deduction from rental income are the direct expenses that are wholly and exclusively incurred in the production of the rental income.
Examples of such expenses are as follows – assessment and quit rent, interest on loan and fire insurance premium, expenses on rent collection, expenses on rent renewal, expenses on repair and service charges. However, only expenses incurred after the new apartment has been rented out are deductible from the rental income. Initial expenses are not deductible. Examples of initial expenses are the cost incurred to obtain the first tenant, such as advertising cost, legal cost to prepare rental agreement, stamp duty and commission for real property agent.
> I have two properties under joint ownership with my wife. The rental agreement is in my wife's name and she collects all proceeds. She is unemployed and we have separate assessments as she was working previously.
Do we need to submit rental income in both our tax submissions equally divided or can she report all the rental income ?
The registered owners (as evidenced in the title deeds or any equivalent documents to demonstrate ownership) of the properties are the rightful recipients of the rental income. Thus, both you and your wife would be required to declare your respective portion of the rental income in your individual tax returns based on the ratio of your joint ownership.
> I am currently working overseas but own three properties in Malaysia. Do I need to declare anything to the Inland Revenue Board (IRB)?
Generally, Malaysian-derived income is subject to Malaysian income tax. As the properties are located in Malaysia, the rental income from the letting of properties is regarded as Malaysian-derived income. Therefore, you are required to declare the rental income to IRB by completing and submitting the relevant tax return form. The type of tax return to be submitted is dependent on your tax residence for the year concerned. Generally, tax resident individuals are subject to the progressive tax rates and entitled to personal reliefs/deductions and rebates. Non-tax residents are taxed a flat rate of 26% without any personal reliefs/deductions and rebates.
> If I have two properties purchased under the DIBS during the qualifying period for housing loan interest deduction, say house A in 2009 (completion 2011) and house B in 2010 (completion 2014), can I claim deduction for house A from 2011 to 2013, and house B from 2014 to 2016? At any one time, I intend to claim deduction for one house only.
The current tax laws only allow an individual who is a Malaysian and tax resident to claim interest expenses on housing loan provided certain conditions are satisfied. One of the conditions is the claim is limited to only one unit of residential property. If you have claimed interest expenses for house A in your 2011 tax return, you will be eligible to claim the interest expenses for house A in your 2012 and 2013 tax returns provided you have fully complied with the stipulated conditions. You would not be able to claim any deduction for house B.
> A father and son jointly purchased a house in 2010. Assuming the house was rented out and the son received the rent and used it to repay the housing loan, is the father required to declare any rent received? If so, how should the father compute his net income from rent?
As the property is jointly owned by the both the father and son in the title deed or any equivalent document, the rental income would be regarded as the income of both registered owners. Both would be required to declare their share of the net rental income (after deduction of the relevant expenses) in accordance to the ratio of the ownership of the property. The net rental income is arrived at after deduction of the interest on loan, fire insurance, assessment and quit rent, and repairs and maintenance. However, only the expenses incurred after the letting of the property are deductible.
> Disclaimer: The answers contained in this article are provided for general purposes only. Answers may differ based on personal and specific circumstances. While every effort has been made to ensure that the answers are accurate and up to date at press time, KPMG Tax Services Sdn Bhd and the contributor to the answers accept no responsibility for any loss which may arise from reliance on the answers contained in this article.
|You are subscribed to email updates from xBlog ☪ Highlight Sociopolitical Blogs |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610|